INVESTIGATING INTEGRATION CAPABILITIES BETWEEN IFC AND CITYGML LOD3 FOR 3D CITYMODELLING

Abstract. Smart cities are applied to an increasing number of application fields. This evolution though urges data collection and integration, hence major issues arise that need to be tackled. One of the most important challenges is the heterogeneity of collected data, especially if those data derive from different standards and vary in terms of geometry, topology and semantics. Another key challenge is the efficient analysis and visualization of spatial data, which due to the complexity of the physical reality in modern world, 2D GIS struggles to cope with. So, in order to facilitate data analysis and enhance the role of smart cities, the 3rd dimension needs to be implemented. Standards such as CityGML and IFC fulfill that necessity but they present major differences in their schemas that render their integration a challenging task. This paper focuses on addressing those differences, examining the up to date research work and investigates an alternative methodology in order to bridge the gap between those Standards. Within this framework, a generic IFC model is generated and converted to a CityGML Model, which is validated and evaluated on its geometrical correctness and semantical coherence. General results as well as future research considerations are presented.

[1]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Building Product Models: Computer Environments, Supporting Design and Construction , 1999 .

[2]  Mohamed El-Mekawy,et al.  An Evaluation of IFC-CityGML Unidirectional Conversion , 2012 .

[3]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Representing and Exchanging 3D City Models with CityGML , 2009 .

[4]  Lutz Plümer,et al.  CityGML – Interoperable semantic 3D city models , 2012 .

[5]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Towards Defining a Framework for Automatic Generation of Buildings in CityGML Using Building Information Models , 2009 .

[6]  Khurram Shahzad,et al.  Towards Interoperating CityGML and IFC Building Models: A Unified Model Based Approach , 2010 .

[7]  Georgios K. Ouzounis,et al.  Smart cities of the future , 2012, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[8]  Jantien E. Stoter,et al.  Automatic conversion of IFC datasets to geometrically and semantically correct CityGML LOD3 buildings , 2016, Trans. GIS.

[9]  S. Donkers,et al.  Automatic generation of CityGML LoD3 building models from IFC models , 2013 .

[10]  Ruben de Laat,et al.  Integration of BIM and GIS: The Development of the CityGML GeoBIM Extension , 2011 .

[11]  Mohamed El-Mekawy,et al.  INTEGRATING BIM AND GIS FOR 3D CITY MODELLING The Case of IFC and CityGML , 2010 .

[12]  For Corba Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. OpenGIS Simple Features Specification , 2005 .

[13]  Wang Tao,et al.  Interdisciplinary urban GIS for smart cities: advancements and opportunities , 2013, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[14]  Karl-Heinz Häfele,et al.  OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard , 2012 .

[15]  Awais Ahmad,et al.  Urban planning and building smart cities based on the Internet of Things using Big Data analytics , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review on the Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information System (GIS) , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[17]  George Floros,et al.  INVESTIGATING INTEGRATION POSSIBILITIES BETWEEN 3D MODELING TECHNIQUES , 2014 .

[18]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Standards for Exchange and Storage of 3D Information: Challenges and Opportunities for Emergency Response , 2012 .

[19]  Nor Badrul Anuar,et al.  The role of big data in smart city , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Thomas H. Kolbe,et al.  Conceptual Requirements for the Automatic Reconstruction of Building Information Models from Uninterpreted 3D Models , 2009 .

[21]  Filip Biljecki,et al.  THE MOST COMMON GEOMETRIC AND SEMANTIC ERRORS IN CITYGMLDATASETS , 2016 .