Business process flexibility through the exploration of stimuli

For organisations to survive and flourish in a changing environment, their business processes need to be flexible. Ashby's law of requisite variety applied to business processes postulates that a robust process needs to exhibit as much as variety in its responses as there are stimuli in its environment. An essential aspect of the design of a business process is to know to what stimuli it needs to respond to. In this paper, stimuli to the requirements of Business Process Flexibility (BPF) are examined. A classification framework is proposed to characterise the environmental stimuli. Using this framework, business process designers can visualise variations of the stimuli affecting the process. They can then consider if the Business Process Support (BPS) system would adequately manage the variations in the stimuli. The use of the framework is illustrated with the example of a university train ticket purchasing process.

[1]  W. B. Harvey,et al.  The Weakest Link , 2008 .

[2]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[3]  Gil Regev,et al.  Taxonomy of Flexibility in Business Processes , 2006, BPMDS.

[4]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Modelling the regulative role of business processes with use and misuse cases , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  J. Adamson "The weakest link". , 1981, The Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgical nursing : official organ of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[6]  Larry L. Constantine,et al.  Essential modeling: use cases for user interfaces , 1995, INTR.

[7]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  How to handle dynamic change and capture management information? An approach based on generic workflow models , 2001, Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Writing Effective Use Cases , 2000 .

[9]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design , 1989 .

[10]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  On the Systemic Enterprise Architecture Methodology (Seam) , 2003, ICEIS.

[11]  Abraham Bernstein,et al.  How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group process? bridging the specificity frontier , 2000, CSCW '00.

[12]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Where do goals come from: the underlying principles of goal-oriented requirements engineering , 2005, 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05).

[13]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[14]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[15]  Bruce W. Ahlstrand,et al.  Strategy Safari: The complete guide through the wilds of strategic management , 2008 .

[16]  D. Engelbart TOWARD HIGH-PERFORMANCE ORGANIZATIONS: A STRATEGIC ROLE FOR GROUPWARE , 1992 .

[17]  Grzegorz Rozenberg,et al.  Dynamic change within workflow systems , 1995, COCS '95.

[18]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Defining Requirements for Business Process Flexibility , 2006, BPMDS.

[19]  Ilia Bider,et al.  Defining business process flexibility with the help of invariants , 2007, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[20]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  General principles of systems design , 1988 .

[21]  Neil Maiden,et al.  Scenarios, Stories, Use Cases: Through the Systems Development Life-Cycle , 2004 .