Damage identification in a complex truss structure using modal characteristics correlation method and sensitivity-weighted search space

Damage identification for complex structures is a challenging task due to the large amount of structural elements, limited number of measured modes and uncertainties in referenced numerical models. This article presents a study on enhancing the effectiveness of modal characteristics correlation methods for damage identification of complex structures. First, a correlation method using change in the ratio of modal strain energy to eigenvalue is introduced. Damage information is determined via a forward approach by optimizing the correlation level between the patterns of the analytical and measured changes in the ratio of modal strain energy to eigenvalue. Different from traditional optimization-based forward methods that require accurate numerical models, damage sensitivity coefficients of the ratio of modal strain energy to eigenvalue are directly estimated from the experimental modal information. To enhance the damage identification capability, both the elemental modal strain energy–eigenvalue ratio and the total modal strain energy–eigenvalue ratio components are examined in the correlation function. Second, a sensitivity-weighted search space scheme incorporated with genetic algorithm is developed to overcome the ill-posed problem that causes false detection errors. Finally, the correlation method and the enhanced technique are experimentally tested on a complex truss model with nearly 100 elements. To deal with the huge number of degrees of freedom in this structure, a multi-layout roving test with the adoption of redundant channels is designed, and a three-criterion strategy is used for the selection of modes. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed damage assessment framework to locate and estimate damage in complex truss structures.

[1]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Ardeshir Bahreininejad,et al.  Damage detection of truss bridge joints using Artificial Neural Networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande , 1994 .

[4]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Structural damage detection method using frequency response functions , 2014 .

[5]  Ting-Yu Hsu,et al.  Damage Diagnosis of Frame Structures Using Modified Modal Strain Energy Change Method , 2008 .

[6]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  A damage localization method based on the ‘jerk energy’ , 2014 .

[7]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .

[8]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis: Brincker/Introduction to Operational Modal Analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Buddhi Lankananda Wahalathantri Damage assessment in reinforced concrete flexural members using modal strain energy based method , 2012 .

[10]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Effects of Wireless Sensor Network Uncertainties on Output-Only Modal Analysis Employing Merged Data of Multiple Tests , 2012 .

[11]  H. J. Salane,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF MODAL PROPERTIES OF BRIDGES , 1990 .

[12]  Hong Hao,et al.  Damage identification of structures with uncertain frequency and mode shape data , 2002 .

[13]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario , 1999 .

[14]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Structural Complexity in Structural Health Monitoring: Preliminary Experimental Modal Testing and Analysis , 2015, WCE-2015 2015.

[15]  S. S. Law,et al.  DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[16]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[17]  Pei-Ling Liu,et al.  Identification and Damage Detection of Trusses Using Modal Data , 1995 .

[18]  S. Law,et al.  Structural Damage Detection from Modal Strain Energy Change , 2000 .

[19]  S. M. Seyedpoor,et al.  A New Flexibility Based Damage Index for Damage Detection of Truss Structures , 2014 .

[20]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method , 2003 .

[21]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Structural damage identification based on change in geometric modal strain energy-eigenvalue ratio , 2016 .

[22]  Nicholas Haritos,et al.  Damage Identification in Plate-like Structures using Bending Moment Response Power Spectral Density , 2007 .

[23]  Binbin Li,et al.  An algorithm for damage localization in steel truss structures: Numerical simulation and experimental validation , 2013 .

[24]  Ki-Young Koo,et al.  Damage detection of shear buildings using deflections obtained by modal flexibility , 2010 .

[25]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Correlation-Based Damage Detection for Complicated Truss Bridges Using Multi-Layer Genetic Algorithm , 2012 .

[26]  Liu Meie,et al.  液晶エラストマー片持梁の光‐熱‐機械的駆動の曲げとスナップ動力学 , 2014 .

[27]  David Nowell,et al.  Measurements of pressure and area dependent tangential contact stiffness between rough surfaces using digital image correlation , 2011 .

[28]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  An overview of modal-based damage identification methods , 1997 .

[29]  Soon Gie Lee,et al.  Reference-free damage detection for truss bridge structures by continuous relative wavelet entropy method , 2014 .

[30]  E. J. Williams,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION BY A SENSITIVITY AND STATISTICAL-BASED METHOD , 1998 .

[31]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Damage detection in truss bridges using vibration based multi-criteria approach , 2011 .

[32]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .