Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach for ranking the sawability of carbonate rock

Abstract A new classification system is presented to evaluate and ranking the sawability of carbonate rock. The sawability of carbonate rock is classified into five categories: excellent, good, fair, poor and very poor. The sawability is assumed to depend on the uniaxial compressive strength, Young’s modulus, Mohs hardness, and a new abrasivity index. The FAHP approach is used to determine the weights of the above-mentioned parameters by decision makers. Moreover, in this paper, a new classification system was developed to modify Schimazek’s F-abrasiveness factor. In this new abrasivity classification, each parameter has a different importance coefficient. The new abrasivity index of carbonate rocks can be obtained from this new abrasivity classification system. The calculated sawability index of developed classification is applied for Iranian carbonate rocks to evaluation the energy consumption in rock sawing process. A variety of two groups of carbonate rocks (seven types) were saw using a fully instrumented laboratory sawing rig at different feed rates, peripheral speeds, and depth of cut. Then, a new statistical model was obtained using multiple regression method based on operating parameters and rock sawability index.

[1]  L. M. Suárez Del Río,et al.  The influence of rock microhardness on the sawability of Pink Porrino granite (Spain) , 2005 .

[2]  Farhang Sereshki,et al.  Multifactorial fuzzy approach to the penetrability classification of TBM in hard rock conditions , 2009 .

[3]  E. T. Brown Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods , 1981 .

[4]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Evaluating Machine Tool Alternatives , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  Yilmaz Ozcelik,et al.  Statistical and microscopic investigation of disc segment wear related to sawing Ankara andesites , 2003 .

[6]  A. Ersoy,et al.  Performance characteristics of circular diamond saws in cutting different types of rocks , 2004 .

[7]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[8]  Young-Jou Lai,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making , 2016 .

[9]  Y. Özcelik,et al.  The effect of marble textural characteristics on the sawing efficiency of diamond segmented frame saws , 2007 .

[10]  B. S. Tezekici,et al.  Sawability prediction of carbonate rocks from shear strength parameters using artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[11]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process , 2005 .

[12]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Predicting the production rate of diamond wire saw using statistical analysis , 2012, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[13]  I. S. Buyuksagis Effect of cutting mode on the sawability of granites using segmented circular diamond sawblade , 2007 .

[14]  S. Kahraman,et al.  A Quality Classification of Building Stones from P-Wave Velocity and its Application to Stone Cutting with Gang Saw , 2005 .

[15]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  A new classification system for evaluating rock penetrability , 2009 .

[16]  Da Ruan,et al.  Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  U. Atici,et al.  Correlation of specific energy of cutting saws and drilling bits with rock brittleness and destruction energy , 2009 .

[19]  Yu-Hern Chang,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS IN THE REGION OF EAST ASIA , 2003 .

[20]  S. Kahraman,et al.  Performance Prediction of Circular Diamond Saws from Mechanical Rock Properties in Cutting Carbonate Rocks , 2007 .

[21]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[23]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Qunxiong Zhu,et al.  Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  A Decision Support System Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS Approaches for Selection of the Optimum Underground Mining Method , 2009 .

[26]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection , 2007 .

[27]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  A. Ersoy,et al.  Textural characterisation of rocks , 1995 .

[29]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Development of a new classification system for assessing of carbonate rock sawability , 2011 .

[30]  C. Kahraman Capital Budgeting Techniques Using Discounted Fuzzy Cash Flows , 2001 .

[31]  Chengyong Wang,et al.  Study on the fuzzy ranking of granite sawability , 2003 .

[32]  A. Noorul Haq,et al.  Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model , 2006 .

[33]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[34]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[35]  Malcolm James Beynon,et al.  Application and Development of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Capital Investment Study , 2005 .

[36]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[37]  Da Ruan,et al.  Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[38]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  A Multi-Objective Model for Taiwan Notebook Computer Distribution Problem , 2006 .

[39]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Toward a general theory of conditional beliefs , 2006, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[40]  Yilmaz Ozcelik,et al.  Investigation of the effects of textural properties on marble cutting with diamond wire , 2004 .

[41]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile firm , 2007, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[42]  Mario Enea,et al.  Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[43]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[44]  A. Ersoy,et al.  Wear characteristics of circular diamond saws in the cutting of different hard abrasive rocks , 2005 .

[45]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: An application to information technology projects , 2006, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[46]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[47]  George Bojadziev,et al.  Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications , 1996, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[48]  R. M. Goktan,et al.  Investigation of marble machining performance using an instrumented block-cutter , 2005 .

[49]  Z. Bieniawski Engineering rock mass classifications , 1989 .

[50]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[51]  Alexander Shashenko,et al.  Numerical simulation of the elastic-plastic state of rock mass around horizontal workings , 2009 .

[52]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[53]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey , 2004 .

[54]  G. Liang,et al.  Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation , 2001 .

[55]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings , 2004 .

[56]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[57]  O. Gunaydin,et al.  Predicting the sawability of carbonate rocks using multiple curvilinear regression analysis , 2004 .

[58]  S. Kahraman,et al.  Multifactorial fuzzy approach to the sawability classification of building stones , 2007 .

[59]  Hepu Deng,et al.  Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[60]  Da Ruan,et al.  Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows , 2002, Inf. Sci..