Concealing Communities Within the Crowd

This study investigates organizational identity and member identification in a hidden organization operating within a crowd-based collective. Specifically, it draws from Scott’s hidden organization framework to examine the role of the Yelp Elite Squad, an invitation-only organization that receives access to free monthly parties and other rewards organized by a local employee of Yelp. Analyses of qualitative interviews and participant observation indicate that through limited information, restricted channels of communication, and framing participation as “community,” Yelp is able to conceal the Elite Squad organizational identity from both the public as well as members of the Elite Squad. Further analysis reveals tensions emerging from expressing and suppressing organizational identification among members of the Elite Squad. Finally, Yelp is shown to broker (in)visibilities of the Elite Squad with local businesses to create value for the organization.

[1]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  The future of crowd work , 2013, CSCW.

[2]  A. Scherer,et al.  Clandestine Organizations, al Qaeda, and the Paradox of (In)Visibility: A Response to Stohl and Stohl , 2012 .

[3]  C. Stohl Crowds, Clouds, and Community , 2014 .

[4]  Keri K. Stephens,et al.  It Depends on Who You're Talking To…: Predictors and Outcomes of Situated Measures of Organizational Identification , 2009 .

[5]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[6]  Sanmay Das,et al.  Manipulation among the Arbiters of Collective Intelligence , 2016, ACM Trans. Web.

[7]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Organizations as Discursive Constructions , 2004 .

[8]  Landon P. Cox Truth in Crowdsourcing , 2011, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[9]  Craig R. Scott,et al.  Anonymous Agencies, Backstreet Businesses, and Covert Collectives: Rethinking Organizations in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[10]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  W. Bennett,et al.  Response to Sidney Tarrow’s review of The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics , 2013, Perspectives on Politics.

[12]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[13]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[14]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change , 2012 .

[15]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Volunteering and Communication , 2013 .

[16]  C. Stohl,et al.  Secret Agencies: The Communicative Constitution of a Clandestine Organization , 2011 .

[17]  C. Caroll,et al.  The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand , 2000 .

[18]  K. Ashcraft,et al.  Special Issue Introduction , 2004 .

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[20]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[21]  M. Savage,et al.  Elites: Remembered in Capitalism and Forgotten by Social Sciences , 2008 .

[22]  Mark Snyder,et al.  The Motivations to Volunteer , 1999 .

[23]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in the Organization , 1998 .

[24]  Qian Xu,et al.  Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  James Caverlee,et al.  Exploitation in Human Computation Systems , 2013, Handbook of Human Computation.

[26]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[27]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  Hoaxes and the Paradoxical Challenges of Restoring Legitimacy , 2012 .

[29]  Michael Luca Reviews, Reputation, and Revenue: The Case of Yelp.Com , 2016 .

[30]  Aaron D. Shaw,et al.  Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Production , 2014, ArXiv.