Failure prediction of axi-symmetric cup in deep drawing and expansion processes

Abstract Presented work deals with the prediction of the forming limit of food can obtained with deep drawing, reverse drawing and expansion operations. Two commonly used materials of TH330 steel and AA5352 aluminium alloy for packaging can production were studied. Finite element simulation (FEM) is an essential tool in the packaging industry to prevent different sheet metal forming difficulties such as failure under complex nonlinear strain paths and plastic anisotropic earing. In order to characterise the material plastic properties and to specify failure criteria, the uniaxial tensile, hydraulic bulge test, as well as the routines for obtaining forming limit curves were carried out. The input material data required for various material models are also described. Utilisation of advanced material models in numerical simulation require a large number of input data. Prediction of failure location in drawing and expansion of axi-symmetric cups were estimated for each material. The FEM results were verified by real experiments.

[1]  Y. Ivanisenko,et al.  The α → ω Transformation in Titanium-Cobalt Alloys under High-Pressure Torsion , 2017 .

[2]  Ján Slota,et al.  Material Model of AW 5754 H11 Al Alloy for Numerical Simulation of Deep Drawing Process , 2016 .

[3]  S. Kyriakides,et al.  Effects of anisotropy on material hardening and burst in the bulge test , 2016 .

[4]  Jiro Hiramoto,et al.  Improvement of springback prediction accuracy using material model considering elastoplastic anisotropy and Bauschinger effect , 2016 .

[5]  Lihui Lang,et al.  A novel approach to determine plastic hardening curves of AA7075 sheet utilizing hydraulic bulging test at elevated temperature , 2015 .

[6]  F. Barlat,et al.  Experimental and theoretical formability analysis using strain and stress based forming limit diagram for advanced high strength steels , 2013 .

[7]  B. Williams,et al.  Characterization of anisotropic yield surfaces for titanium sheet using hydrostatic bulging with elliptical dies , 2016 .

[8]  J. Slota,et al.  Advanced Material Models for Stamping of AW 5754 Aluminum Alloy , 2016, Strength of Materials.

[9]  Abel D. Santos,et al.  On the determination of the work hardening curve using the bulge test , 2016 .

[10]  Jun Cao,et al.  A modified elliptical fracture criterion to predict fracture forming limit diagrams for sheet metals , 2018 .

[11]  H. Aretz,et al.  Accurate determination of flow curves using the bulge test with optical measuring systems , 2015 .

[12]  Ján Slota,et al.  Numerical Prediction of Forming Car Body Parts with Emphasis on Springback , 2018, Metals.

[13]  G. Cosovici,et al.  FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion , 2004 .

[14]  Hyunki Kim,et al.  Comparison of 3D yield functions for finite element simulation of single point incremental forming (SPIF) of aluminum 7075 , 2017 .

[15]  R. Cardoso,et al.  A generalisation of the hill's quadratic yield function for planar plastic anisotropy to consider loading direction , 2017 .

[16]  D. Kang,et al.  A study on determining hardening curve for sheet metal , 2003 .