Spray Drift and Off-Target Loss Reductions with a Precision Air-Assisted Sprayer

Abstract. Spray drift and off-target losses are inherent problems of conventional air-assisted sprayers; consequently, their low efficiencies cause environmental pollution and public anxiety. A new drift reduction technology incorporating laser scanning capabilities with a variable-rate air-assisted sprayer was developed to address these problems. This new sprayer, the same sprayer with the variable-rate function disabled, and a conventional constant-rate air-blast sprayer were tested for comparison of spray drift and off-target losses in an apple orchard. Tests were conducted at three different growth stages: trees just beginning to leaf (leafing), half foliage, and full foliage. Spray deposits from spray drift and off-target losses were collected within tree rows at ground level, above and behind the sprayed trees, in the spaces between trees, and from 3.2 m tall poles at 5, 15, and 35 m from the tree rows. Compared to the constant-rate sprayers, the laser-guided variable-rate sprayer reduced average spray losses on the ground by 68% to 90% and around tree canopies by 70% to 92%, reduced airborne spray drift by 70% to 100%, and most importantly, reduced the spray volume by 47% to 73%, while spray deposition quality inside the canopy for these sprayers was comparable. These results demonstrate that the variable-rate sprayer incorporating the innovative laser scanning technology reduced spray drift and off-target losses of pesticides, was environmentally sustainable, and was economically beneficial to growers.

[1]  A. Escolà,et al.  Obtaining the three-dimensional structure of tree orchards from remote 2D terrestrial LIDAR scanning , 2009 .

[2]  N. B. Akesson,et al.  Effects of Spray Adjuvants on Drift Hazards , 1976 .

[3]  B Huyghebaert,et al.  Comparative performance of recycling tunnel and conventional sprayers using standard and drift-mitigating nozzles in dwarf apple orchards , 2010 .

[4]  F. Solanelles,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Assessment of Recycling Tunnel Sprayers in Mediterranean Vineyards and Apple Orchards , 2002 .

[5]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution , 2011 .

[6]  R. D. Brazee,et al.  Downwind Residues from Spraying a Semi-dwarf Apple Orchard , 1993 .

[7]  Qamar Uz Zaman,et al.  ESTIMATION OF CITRUS FRUIT YIELD USING ULTRASONICALLY-SENSED TREE SIZE , 2006 .

[8]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Coverage and Drift Produced by Air Induction and Conventional Hydraulic Nozzles Used for Orchard Applications , 2000 .

[9]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Spray Drift From Ground and Aerial Applications , 1992 .

[10]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  AIRBORNE SPRAY COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF NYLON SCREEN , 2004 .

[11]  Joan Ramón Rosell Polo,et al.  A tractor-mounted scanning LIDAR for the non-destructive measurement of vegetative volume and surface area of tree-row plantations: A comparison with conventional destructive measurements , 2009 .

[12]  H. Y. Jeon,et al.  Development of a Variable-Rate Sprayer for Nursery Liner Applications , 2012 .

[13]  M. J. Delwiche,et al.  Sprayer control by sensing orchard crop characteristics: Orchard architecture and spray liquid savings , 1989 .

[14]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  Development of a Variable-Rate Sprayer with Laser Scanning Sensor to Synchronize Spray Outputs to Tree Structures , 2012 .

[15]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  EVALUATION OF A PNEUMATIC–SHIELDED SPRAYING SYSTEM BY CFD SIMULATION , 2002 .

[16]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Spray deposition inside tree canopies from a newly developed variable-rate air-assisted sprayer , 2013 .

[17]  D. L. Peterson,et al.  Tunnel sprayer for dwarf fruit trees. , 1994 .

[18]  A. Escolà,et al.  Variable rate dosing in precision viticulture: use of electronic devices to improve application efficiency. , 2010 .

[19]  Durham K. Giles,et al.  Pesticide Application Technology: Research and Development and the Growth of the Industry , 2008 .

[20]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  A HISTORY OF AIR-BLAST SPRAYER DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE PROSPECTS , 2008 .

[21]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Shields to Reduce Spray Drift , 1997 .

[22]  Masoud Salyani,et al.  Development of a laser scanner for measuring tree canopy characteristics: Phase 1. Prototype development , 2004 .

[23]  and F H Lewis,et al.  Fungicide Usage on Deciduous Fruit Trees , 1972 .

[24]  M Dosemeci,et al.  The Agricultural Health Study. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  G. M. Richardson,et al.  IT—Information Technology and the Human Interface: Comparison of Different Spray Volume Deposition Models Using LIDAR Measurements of Apple Orchards , 2002 .

[26]  Heping Zhu,et al.  A SPECIALLY DESIGNED AIR-ASSISTED SPRAYER TO IMPROVE SPRAY PENETRATION AND AIR JET VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION INSIDE DENSE NURSERY CROPS , 2006 .

[27]  A. Escolà,et al.  Variable rate application of plant protection products in vineyard using ultrasonic sensors , 2007 .

[28]  D. L. Reichard,et al.  Effects of Polymer Composition and Viscosity on Droplet Size of Recirculated Spray Solutions , 1997 .

[29]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  Effect of Drift Retardant Chemicals on Spray Drift, Droplet Size and Spray Pattern , 1993 .