Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model.

Batch anaerobic codigestion of municipal household solid waste (MHSW) and digested manure in mesophilic conditions was carried out. The different waste-to-biomass ratios and intensity of mixing were studied theoretically and experimentally. The experiments showed that when organic loading was high, intensive mixing resulted in acidification and failure of the process, while low mixing intensity was crucial for successful digestion. However, when loading was low, mixing intensity had no significant effect on the process. We hypothesized that mixing was preventing establishment of methanogenic zones in the reactor space. The methanogenic zones are important to withstand inhibition due to development of acids formed during acidogenesis. The 2D distributed models of symmetrical cylinder reactor are presented based on the hypothesis of the necessity of a minimum size of methanogenic zones that can propagate and establish a good methanogenic environment. The model showed that at high organic loading rate spatial separation of the initial methanogenic centers from active acidogenic areas is the key factor for efficient conversion of solids to methane. The initial level of methanogenic biomass in the initiation centers is a critical factor for the survival of these centers. At low mixing, most of the initiation methanogenic centers survive and expand over the reactor volume. However, at vigorous mixing the initial methanogenic centers are reduced in size, averaged over the reactor volume, and finally dissipate. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, large irregular cocci of microorganisms were observed in the case with minimal mixing, while in the case with high stirring mainly dead cells were found.

[1]  L. Bere,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art , 2000 .

[2]  R. J. Field,et al.  Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems , 1985 .

[3]  K. McMahon,et al.  Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  V. Vavilin,et al.  Effect of mass transfer on concentration wave propagation during anaerobic digestion of solid waste. , 2002, Water research.

[5]  A. Lagerkvist,et al.  Effects of co-disposal of wastes containing organic pollutants with municipal solid waste - A landfill simulation reactor study , 2003 .

[6]  J. Rintala,et al.  Evaluation of kinetic coefficients using integrated monod and haldane models for low-temperature acetoclastic methanogenesis. , 2001, Water research.

[7]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance. , 2001, Water research.

[8]  A. Zhabotinsky A history of chemical oscillations and waves. , 1991, Chaos.

[9]  Heijo Scharff,et al.  Effect of pH and VFA on hydrolysis of organic solid waste , 2000 .

[10]  V A Vavilin,et al.  Modeling solid waste decomposition. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[11]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion: Effects of leachate recirculation and pH adjustment , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  T. J. Phelps,et al.  Gas Metabolism Evidence in Support of the Juxtaposition of Hydrogen-Producing and Methanogenic Bacteria in Sewage Sludge and Lake Sediments , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--II: Microbial population dynamics. , 2001, Water research.

[15]  J Rintala,et al.  A distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion: sensitivity analysis. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  I. W. Koster,et al.  Dry anaerobic batch digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste , 2007 .

[17]  Hideki Harada,et al.  Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using 16S rRNA-Targeted Oligonucleotides Reveals Localization of Methanogens and Selected Uncultured Bacteria in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Sludge Granules , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  P. Weiland One- and Two-Step Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Agroindustrial Residues , 1993 .

[19]  R. K. Ham,et al.  Bacterial Population Development and Chemical Characteristics of Refuse Decomposition in a Simulated Sanitary Landfill , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  V. Vavilin,et al.  The Effect of Fatty Acid Diffusion in Leachate on the Propagation of Concentration Waves in the Process of Municipal Solid Waste Decomposition , 2001 .

[21]  J. Rintala,et al.  A comparative analysis of a balance between the rates of polymer hydrolysis and acetoclastic methanogenesis during anaerobic digestion of solid waste. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  R. Speece,et al.  Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. , 2002, Water research.

[23]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. , 1999, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[24]  I. Epstein The consequences of imperfect mixing in autocatalytic chemical and biological systems , 1995, Nature.

[25]  P. Chynoweth,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a nonmixed solids concentrating digestor , 1990 .

[26]  Robert K. Ham,et al.  Methane production from municipal refuse: A review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics , 1990 .

[27]  J. Dolfing The energetic consequences of hydrogen gradients in methanogenic ecosystems , 1992 .