Canonical modeling: review of concepts with emphasis on environmental health.

The article reviews concepts of canonical modeling in the context of environmental health. Based on biochemical systems theory, the canonical approach was developed over the past thirty years and applied to complex systems primarily in biochemistry and the regulation of gene expression. Canonical modeling is based on nonlinear ordinary differential equations whose right-hand sides consist of products of power-law functions. This structure results from the linearization of complex processes in logarithmic space. The canonical structure has many intriguing features. First, almost any system of smooth functions or ordinary differential equations can be recast equivalently in a canonical model, which demonstrates that the model structure is rich enough to deal with all relevant nonlinearities. Second, a large body of successful applications suggests that canonical models are often valid and accurate representations of quite complex, real-world systems. Third, a set of guidelines supports the modeler in all phases of analysis. These guidelines address model design, algebraic and numerical analysis, and the interpretation of results. Fourth, the structure of canonical models, especially those in S-system form, facilitates algebraic and numerical analyses. Of particular importance is the derivation of steady-state solutions in an explicit symbolic or numerical form, which allows further assessments of stability and robustness. The homogeneous structure of canonical models has also led to the development of very efficient, customized computer algorithms for all steps of a typical analysis. Fifth, a surprising number of models currently used in environmental health research are special cases of canonical models. The traditional models are thus subsumed in one modeling framework, which offers new avenues of analysis and interpretation.

[1]  E. Voit,et al.  An indirect optimization method for biochemical systems: description of method and application to the maximization of the rate of ethanol, glycerol, and carbohydrate production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  J. Burger,et al.  Temporal scales in ecological risk assessment , 1992, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[3]  James White,et al.  The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule , 1981 .

[4]  M. A. Savageau,et al.  A Suprasystem of Probability Distributions , 1982 .

[5]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  The S‐Distribution A Tool for Approximation and Classification of Univariate, Unimodal Probability Distributions , 1992 .

[6]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Rules for coupled expression of regulator and effector genes in inducible circuits. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  K. Olden,et al.  Environmental health science research and human risk assessment , 1995, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[8]  M. Savageau Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: implications of fractal kinetics. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  S. Schuster,et al.  The modelling of metabolic systems. Structure, control and optimality. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[10]  Hayton Wl Dosimetric Models: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS FOR INTERSPECIES SCALING USING ALLOMETRIC TECHNIQUES , 2006 .

[11]  Michael A. Savageau,et al.  Growth equations: A general equation and a survey of special cases , 1980 .

[12]  Steven F. Arnold,et al.  Synergistic Activation of Estrogen Receptor with Combinations of Environmental Chemicals , 1996, Science.

[13]  Fumihide Shiraishi,et al.  The Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2001 .

[14]  A Sorribas,et al.  Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: reversible pathways. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[15]  M A Savageau,et al.  Network regulation of the immune response: alternative control points for suppressor modulation of effector lymphocytes. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[16]  Eberhard O. Voit Dynamics of Self-Thinning Plant Stands , 1988 .

[17]  E O Voit,et al.  Utility of Biochemical Systems Theory for the Analysis of Metabolic Effects from Low‐Dose Chemical Exposure , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  A Sorribas,et al.  Estimating age-related trends in cross-sectional studies using S-distributions. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Modeling forest growth II. Biomass partitioning in Scots pine , 1996 .

[20]  Eberhard O. Voit Dynamic trends in distributions , 1996 .

[21]  J Ovádi,et al.  Physiological significance of metabolic channelling. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[23]  John D. Scott,et al.  Molecular Glue: Kinase Anchoring and Scaffold Proteins , 1996, Cell.

[24]  A Sorribas,et al.  A comparison of variant theories of intact biochemical systems. II. Flux-oriented and metabolic control theories. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[25]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Completely uncoupled and perfectly coupled gene expression in repressible systems. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  S. Moolgavkar,et al.  Two-event models for carcinogenesis: incidence curves for childhood and adult tumors☆ , 1979 .

[27]  Michael A. Savageau,et al.  Application of Biochemical Systems Theory to Metabolism in Human Red Blood Cells , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  E O Voit,et al.  Derivation of the linear-logistic model and Cox's proportional hazard model from a canonical system description. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Harold F. Hemond,et al.  Chemical fate and transport in the environment , 1994 .

[30]  M A Savageau,et al.  The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. II. Evaluation of model consistency and robustness. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  A Sorribas,et al.  Mathematical models of purine metabolism in man. , 1998, Mathematical biosciences.

[32]  G. R. Welch,et al.  On the role of organized multienzyme systems in cellular metabolism: a general synthesis. , 1977, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[33]  E. Voit,et al.  Recasting nonlinear differential equations as S-systems: a canonical nonlinear form , 1987 .

[34]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[35]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. III. Dynamic solutions using a power-law approximation , 1970 .

[36]  A Sorribas,et al.  A comparison of variant theories of intact biochemical systems. I. Enzyme-enzyme interactions and biochemical systems theory. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  E O Voit,et al.  Random Number Generation from Right‐Skewed, Symmetric, and Left‐Skewed Distributions , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  R Heinrich,et al.  Metabolic regulation and mathematical models. , 1977, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[39]  A Sorribas,et al.  Comparative characterization of the fermentation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using biochemical systems theory and metabolic control analysis: model validation and dynamic behavior. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.

[40]  E. Adolph,et al.  Quantitative Relations in the Physiological Constitutions of Mammals. , 1949, Science.

[41]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[42]  M A Savageau,et al.  Subunit structure of regulator proteins influences the design of gene circuitry: analysis of perfectly coupled and completely uncoupled circuits. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  M. Savageau Development of fractal kinetic theory for enzyme-catalysed reactions and implications for the design of biochemical pathways. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[44]  E. J. Furtaw,et al.  An overview of human exposure modeling activities at the USEPA’s National Exposure Research Laboratory , 2001, Toxicology and industrial health.

[45]  M A Savageau Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: dynamic considerations. , 1975, Journal of molecular evolution.

[46]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[47]  D Garfinkel Computer-based modeling of biological systems which are inherently complex: problems, strategies, and methods. , 1985, Biomedica biochimica acta.

[48]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Biochemical systems theory and metabolic control theory: 1. fundamental similarities and differences , 1987 .

[49]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[50]  M A Savageau,et al.  Influence of fractal kinetics on molecular recognition , 1993, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[51]  G. Serio Two-stage stochastic model for carcinogenesis with time-dependent parameters , 1984 .

[52]  C Koch,et al.  Complexity and the nervous system. , 1999, Science.

[53]  M A Savageau,et al.  Model assessment and refinement using strategies from biochemical systems theory: application to metabolism in human red blood cells. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  C Reder,et al.  Metabolic control theory: a structural approach. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Hierarchical Monte Carlo modeling with S-distributions: Concepts and illustrative analysis of mercury contamination in king mackerel , 1995 .

[56]  William H. Hayt,et al.  Engineering Circuit Analysis , 1971 .

[57]  S. Kooijman,et al.  A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species , 1987 .

[58]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Biochemical systems theory and metabolic control theory: 2. the role of summation and connectivity relationships , 1987 .

[59]  M A Savageau,et al.  Network regulation of the immune response: modulation of suppressor lymphocytes by alternative signals including contrasuppression. , 1985, Journal of immunology.

[60]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Canonical nonlinear modeling : S-system approach to understanding complexity , 1991 .

[61]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  A Simple, Flexible Failure Model , 1995 .

[62]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  The S‐Distribution: Approximation of Discrete Distributions , 1994 .

[63]  CLARENCE J. GIBBS,et al.  Allometric morphogenesis of complex systems : Derivation of the basic equations from first principles " , .

[64]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  M A Savageau,et al.  Mathematics of organizationally complex systems. , 1985, Biomedica biochimica acta.

[66]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[67]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Complexity in biological signaling systems. , 1999, Science.

[68]  M. Savageau Biochemical Systems Analysis: A Study of Function and Design in Molecular Biology , 1976 .

[69]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Modeling forest growth I. Canonical approach , 1996 .

[70]  M A Savageau,et al.  Growth of complex systems can be related to the properties of their underlying determinants. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  M A Savageau,et al.  Accuracy of alternative representations for integrated biochemical systems. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[72]  Savageau Ma,et al.  Reconstructionist molecular biology. , 1991 .