Investigation into the impact of the usability factor on the acceptance of mobile transactions:Empirical study in Saudi Arabia

Both the rapid advances in wireless technologies and the high proliferation rate of mobile communication services and artefacts have had a profound impact on industry, and are beginning to offer interesting and advantageous new services. In particular, the mobile transaction (mtransaction) system has emerged, enabling users to pay for physical and digital goods and services using their mobile devices whenever they want, regardless of their location. Although it is anticipated that m-transactions will enjoy a bright future, there is apparently still reluctance among users to accept mobile transactions, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, it is believed that usability is critical to the success and acceptance of mobile technology innovations in general, and m-transactions in particular. While most of the research into IT innovation acceptance is based on TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) and its many variants, the literature review reveals that there is little research on mobile application usability as an important antecedent factor for the success and acceptance of mobile technologies. This is particularly true in developing countries, especially the Middle East, therefore this project aims to fill this gap in the research. This paper is an extension of four previous studies by the authors, which indicated that usability is the most influential factor in Saudi users’ intentions of utilising mobile transactions. It aims to investigate and empirically test the usability level of mobile transactions from the perspective of Saudi users; this will be achieved by conducting usability experiments with real mobile applications within the target group. In other words, this study is a part of a larger research project and it serves as a validation/verification tool to answer the question “Why does the ease of use of mobile transactions have the highest impact on the intention to use mobile transactions in Saudi Arabia?” Moreover, it will produce a set of empirically-based recommendations for the developers and providers of mobile applications who are interested in the Saudi market. The results of the this study showed that the usability of the tested application, which is considered one of the most popular commercial mobile application in Saudi Arabia (i.e. ‘Souq.com’), is unsatisfactory, with an average SUS Score of 50. Not surprisingly, this low usability negatively affected the willingness of the participants to use the application again.

[1]  L. Herman.  Towards effective usability evaluation in Asia: cross-cultural differences , 1996, Proceedings Sixth Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction.

[2]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[3]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  The Enablers and Disablers of E‐Commerce: Consumers’ Perspectives , 2012, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[4]  Krassie Petrova,et al.  Mobile Payment: An Exploratory Study of Customer Attitudes , 2010, 2010 6th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications.

[5]  Anthony Loera.  Track your order , 2013 .

[6]  Shuang Xu,et al.  Usability for Mobile Commerce Across Multiple Form Factors , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[7]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  How many participants are really enough for usability studies? , 2014, 2014 Science and Information Conference.

[8]  Alain Abran,et al.  An Expert-Based Framework for Evaluating iOS Application Usability , 2013, 2013 Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement.

[9]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[10]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  In Lee,et al.  An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Context of Use within usability activities , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Alain Abran,et al.  The state of the art of mobile application usability evaluation , 2012, 2012 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[14]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  Generating a Domain Specific Inspection Evaluation Method through an Adaptive Framework , 2013 .

[15]  A. Marcus.  Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  Evaluating municipal websites: A methodological comparison of three think-aloud variants , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Anu Kankainen,et al.  Usability testing of mobile applications: a comparison between laboratory and field testing , 2005 .

[19]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[20]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  A Study of the Evaluator Effect in Usability Testing , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Jan Stage,et al.  New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Carol M. Barnum.  Usability Testing Essentials: Ready, Set...Test! , 2010 .

[23]  A. Al-Badi,et al.  Exploratory Study of M‐Transaction: User's Perspectives , 2014, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[24]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  Building a conceptual framework for mobile transaction in Saudi Arabia: A user's perspective , 2014, 2014 Science and Information Conference.

[25]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Challenges, Methodologies, and Issues in the Usability Testing of Mobile Applications , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Omaima Bamasak,et al.  Exploring consumers acceptance of mobile payments - an empirical study , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Commun. Convergence.

[27]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  Task Design: Its Impact on Usability Testing , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services.

[28]  Paul Vickers,et al.  An investigation of the impact of mobile phone and PDA interfaces on the usability of mobile-commerce applications , 2002, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications.

[29]  Ralph J. Burant.  Thanks for Your Patience , 1987 .

[30]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[31]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[32]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Understanding usability in mobile commerce , 2003, CACM.

[33]  Darrel Matthew.  Factors that impact consumer adoption of mobile banking within the m-commerce domain , 2014 .

[34]  Alberto Sampaio.  Quantifying the user experience: practical statistics for user research by Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis , 2013, SOEN.

[35]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  The Impact of Usability of Online Library Catalogues on the User Performance , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA).

[36]  Qingfei Min,et al.  From Usability to Adoption - A New M-commerce Adoption Study Framework , 2009, 2009 WRI International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing.

[37]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Sample sizes for usability tests: mostly math, not magic , 2006, INTR.

[38]  Yung-Ming Li,et al.  Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[40]  Zhao Xinyan,et al.  Notice of RetractionLiterature review on consumer adoption behavior of mobile commerce services , 2011, 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE).

[41]  A. Lancaster,et al.  Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[42]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[43]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .