State discrimination with postmeasurement information and incompatibility of quantum measurements

We discuss the following variant of the standard minimum error state discrimination problem: Alice picks the state she sends to Bob among one of several disjoint state ensembles, and she communicates him the chosen ensemble only at a later time. Two different scenarios then arise: either Bob is allowed to arrange his measurement set-up after Alice has announced him the chosen ensemble, or he is forced to perform the measurement before of Alice's announcement. In the latter case, he can only post-process his measurement outcome when Alice's extra information becomes available. We compare the optimal guessing probabilities in the two scenarios, and we prove that they are the same if and only if there exist compatible optimal measurements for all of Alice's state ensembles. When this is the case, post-processing any of the corresponding joint measurements is Bob's optimal strategy in the post-measurement information scenario. Furthermore, we establish a connection between discrimination with post-measurement information and the standard state discrimination. By means of this connection and exploiting the presence of symmetries, we are able to compute the various guessing probabilities in many concrete examples.

[1]  J. Schwinger UNITARY OPERATOR BASES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Teiko Heinosaari,et al.  Maximally incompatible quantum observables , 2013, 1312.3499.

[3]  A. Holevo Statistical decision theory for quantum systems , 1973 .

[4]  Teiko Heinosaari,et al.  An invitation to quantum incompatibility , 2015, 1511.07548.

[5]  Paul Busch,et al.  Approximate joint measurements of qubit observables , 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[6]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Optimum testing of multiple hypotheses in quantum detection theory , 1975, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Optimal detection of symmetric mixed quantum states , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Andreas J. Winter,et al.  State Discrimination With Post-Measurement Information , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  R. Werner,et al.  Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones , 1998, quant-ph/9807010.

[10]  Claudio Carmeli,et al.  Informationally complete joint measurements on finite quantum systems , 2011, 1111.3509.

[11]  Martin Pl'avala,et al.  All measurements in a probabilistic theory are compatible if and only if the state space is a simplex , 2016, 1608.05614.

[12]  R. Werner OPTIMAL CLONING OF PURE STATES , 1998, quant-ph/9804001.

[13]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  Using postmeasurement information in state discrimination , 2010, 1003.0716.

[14]  Joonwoo Bae,et al.  Structure of minimum-error quantum state discrimination , 2012, 1210.2845.

[15]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Designing optimal quantum detectors via semidefinite programming , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  Sylvia Pulmannová,et al.  Coexistent observables and effects in quantum mechanics , 1997 .

[17]  Claudio Carmeli,et al.  Commutative POVMs and Fuzzy Observables , 2009, 0903.0523.

[18]  Michal Sedl'ak Quantum theory of unambiguous measurements , 2009 .

[19]  János A. Bergou,et al.  Discrimination of quantum states , 2004 .

[20]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity , 2010 .

[21]  Paul Busch,et al.  Comparing the degrees of incompatibility inherent in probabilistic physical theories , 2012, 1210.4142.