Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity

Cow bodyweight gain, calf weaning weight, feed intake and maternal productivity of 500 Angus cows, in 64 replicate groups, were measured over three parities at two locations (Struan and Vasse) as part of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project. The cows were sourced as heifers from the top and bottom 10% of BREEDPLAN Rib Fat EBV (High-Fat and Low-Fat), and from High and Low residual feed intake (RFI) selection lines (High-RFI and Low-RFI). Each of the four genotypes were run under High- and Low-Nutrition (measured as feed on offer) at both sites. The High-Fat cows were 7% more efficient at producing weaner calves under Low-Nutrition than were the Low-Fat cows. This was driven primarily by the 4% difference between the lines in weaning rate. When weaning rate differences were accounted for (as covariate), there was no difference between the Fat lines in the efficiency of weaner weight production. When the weight gain of the cow was included as an output in addition to calf weaning weight, there was also no difference between the Fat lines in efficiency. Low-RFI cows were always more efficient at producing weaner calves than were the High-RFI cows. This was primarily driven through a 7% reduction in annual feed intake (across both nutrition treatments). However, the Low-RFI cows were leaner, had 6.3% lower weaning rate and calved on average 5.4 days later than did the High-RFI cows. Furthermore, the largest differences in feed intake were in spring when feed availability is greatest. In the context of the results herein, a balanced breeding program should include selection for improved reproduction and low RFI.

[1]  J. M. Accioly,et al.  Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 2. Body composition but not reproduction was affected in first-parity cows on both low and high levels of nutrition , 2018 .

[2]  P. Parnell,et al.  A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle , 2018 .

[3]  I. Nuberg,et al.  Maternal body composition in seedstock herds. 1. Grazing management strategy influences perspectives on optimal balance of production traits and maternal productivity , 2018 .

[4]  J. M. Accioly,et al.  Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle: 3. Performance of mature cows. , 2018 .

[5]  P. Parnell,et al.  Maternal body composition in seedstock herds. 4. Genetic parameters for body composition of Angus and Hereford cows , 2018 .

[6]  V. Oddy,et al.  Selection for residual feed intake affects appetite and body composition rather than energetic efficiency , 2018 .

[7]  C. Bottema,et al.  Genetic divergence in residual feed intake affects growth, feed efficiency, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Angus steers in a large commercial feedlot , 2018 .

[8]  J. M. Accioly,et al.  Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 1. Pregnancy rates of heifers differed between fat lines and were affected by weight and fat , 2018 .

[9]  J. M. Accioly,et al.  Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project , 2018 .

[10]  J. M. Accioly,et al.  Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 4. Fat EBVs’ influence on fatness fluctuation and supplementary feeding requirements , 2018 .

[11]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Possible reasons for differences in residual feed intake: an overview. , 2014 .

[12]  B. Earley,et al.  Intake of conserved and grazed grass and performance traits in beef suckler cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake , 2013 .

[13]  M. McGee,et al.  Genetic relationships between feed efficiency in growing males and beef cow performance. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[14]  B. Earley,et al.  Grass silage intake, rumen and blood variables, ultrasonic and body measurements, feeding behavior, and activity in pregnant beef heifers differing in phenotypic residual feed intake. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[15]  K. Shaffer,et al.  Residual feed intake, body composition, and fertility in yearling beef heifers. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[16]  R. Herd,et al.  Onset of puberty and early-life reproduction in Angus females divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake , 2011 .

[17]  J. Archer,et al.  Associations between residual feed intake on ad libitum pasture and restricted feeding in Angus cows , 2011 .

[18]  A. Dolev,et al.  Grazing behavior and energy costs of activity: a comparison between two types of cattle. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[19]  B L Golden,et al.  Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[20]  R. Herd,et al.  Residual feed intake in beef cattle , 2008 .

[21]  E. Okine,et al.  Relationships between progeny residual feed intake and dam productivity traits , 2007 .

[22]  E. Grings,et al.  Effects of restricted feeding of beef heifers during the postweaning period on growth, efficiency, and ultrasound carcass characteristics. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[23]  D. Johnston,et al.  Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia , 2005 .

[24]  J. Archer,et al.  Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake , 2005 .

[25]  Sa Barwick,et al.  Development successes and issues for the future in deriving and applying selection indexes for beef breeding , 2005 .

[26]  D. Crews,et al.  Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review. , 2005, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[27]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Genetic parameters for feed efficiency, fatness, muscle area and feeding behaviour of feedlot finished beef cattle , 2004 .

[28]  Wayne S. Pitchford,et al.  Genetic improvement of feed efficiency of beef cattle: what lessons can be learnt from other species? , 2004 .

[29]  J. Archer,et al.  Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake , 2004 .

[30]  B. C. Hebart,et al.  The use of Technograzing to increase beef production on dry land pastures in south-eastern Australia , 2004 .

[31]  N. Friggens Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding , 2003 .

[32]  John A. Basarab,et al.  Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle , 2003 .

[33]  R. Kemp,et al.  Multiple trait selection for maternal productivity in beef cattle , 2002 .

[34]  J. Archer,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[35]  J. Charlton,et al.  TechnoGrazingTM - a new grazing concept , 2001 .

[36]  D. Garden,et al.  Grazing management studies in the Temperate Pasture Sustainability Key Program: site descriptions, treatments and data collection , 2000 .

[37]  R. Herd,et al.  Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. , 2000 .

[38]  M. Elzo,et al.  Influence of frame size and body condition score on performance of Brahman cattle. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[39]  J. Archer,et al.  Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review , 1999 .

[40]  J. Archer,et al.  Correlated responses in rate of maturation and mature size of cows and steers to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle , 1998 .

[41]  T G Jenkins,et al.  A computer model to predict composition of empty body weight changes in cattle at all stages of maturity. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[42]  D. Lalman,et al.  Influence of postpartum weight and body condition change on duration of anestrus by undernourished suckled beef heifers. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[43]  A. Pleasants Use of a stochastic model of a calving distribution for beef cows for formulating optimal natural mating strategies , 1997 .

[44]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Productivity through weaning of nine breeds of cattle under varying feed availabilities: I. Initial evaluation. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[45]  D. G. Morrison,et al.  Prepartum body condition and weight influences on reproductive performance of first-calf beef cows. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[46]  K. Osoro,et al.  The effect of body condition, live weight, breed, age, calf performance, and calving date on reproductive performance of spring-calving beef cows. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[47]  J. Kinder,et al.  Use of a simulation model to evaluate the influence of reproductive performance and management decisions on net income in beef production. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[48]  J. Maas Relationship between nutrition and reproduction in beef cattle. , 1987, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[49]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Cow type and the nutritional environment: nutritional aspects. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[50]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. , 1984, Journal of animal science.

[51]  C. Morris A review of relationships between aspects of reproduction in beef heifers and their lifetime production. 2. Associations with relative calving date and with dystocia. , 1980 .

[52]  C. Ferrell,et al.  Growth, development and composition of the udder and gravid uterus of beef heifers during pregnancy. , 1976, Journal of animal science.

[53]  J. Lesmeister,et al.  Date of First Calving in Beef Cows and Subsequent Calf Production , 1973 .

[54]  Robert M. Koch,et al.  Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle , 1963 .

[55]  M. R. Koch,et al.  Effect of Energy Level on Reproductive Phenomena of Mature , 1962 .