Multi Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of High Speed Train Nose Using Adaptive Surrogate Model

The objective of this work is to demonstrate the possibility of using adaptive surrogate models for optimization problems which require expensive computations. A hybrid GA PSO algorithm is combined with a kriging based surrogate model. The suggested method was used to nd the optimum shape of a two dimensional nose shape of a high speed train traveling at 350 Km/hr considering both the induced aerodynamic drag and the generated aerodynamic noise. Since the prediction of aerodynamic drag and aerodynamic noise requires computational uid dynamic simulations, to limit the number of computer simulations required for optimization, a surrogate model identical to the kriging model was used. The accuracy of the surrogate model is checked using the parameter EIV there by updating the surrogate model whenever necessary. The results show that the combined shape optimization algorithm requires a small number of simulations to identify the optimum shape compared with other methods. The suggested method not only requires a small number of simulations but is also robust. This makes the study on the eect of different weights on the optimum shape feasible without the need for additional simulations. The results show that the nose shape should be slightly short and pointed to get the best aerodynamic performance in terms of induced drag and the nose shape should be slightly long and little bit blunt for the least aerodynamic noise generated. The optimum nose shapes fall between these two shapes based upon the choice of the weights. Regarding the choice of the weights for the given two dimensional test geometry the best compromise would be to choose 50% drag and 50 % noise.

[1]  Terence Soule,et al.  Breeding swarms: a GA/PSO hybrid , 2005, GECCO '05.

[2]  Raymond P. LeBeau,et al.  Optimization of Airfoil Flow Control Using a Genetic Algorithm with Diversity Control , 2007 .

[3]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[5]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Efficient Global Reliability Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Liang Huang,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF BLOWING AND SUCTION CONTROL ON NACA0012 AIRFOIL USING GENETIC ALGORITHM WITH DIVERSITY CONTROL , 2004 .

[7]  A. Keane,et al.  Design search and optimization in aerospace engineering , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Enrique Alba,et al.  Optimization Techniques for Solving Complex Problems , 2009 .

[9]  P. G. Huang,et al.  Response Surface Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of High Speed Train Nose , 2010 .

[10]  Erwie Zahara,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for multimodal functions , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Toshiaki Setoguchi,et al.  Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train , 2002 .

[12]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.