Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese

It is widely assumed that spoken word production in Germanic languages like Dutch and English involves a parallel activation of phonemic segments and metrical frames in memory, followed by a serial association of segments to the frame, as implemented in the WEAVER++ model (Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999). However, for Oriental languages like Mandarin Chinese and Japanese, researchers have suggested that the serial association concerns atonal phonological syllables (Mandarin Chinese) or moras (Japanese) to tonal frames. Here, the utility of these theoretical suggestions is demonstrated by computer simulations of key empirical findings using versions of WEAVER++ for English, Mandarin Chinese (纺 织 者++), and Japanese (). The simulation outcomes suggest that, although languages may differ in the phonological structure of their words, the principles underlying phonological encoding are similar across languages.

[1]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  The Proximate Phonological Unit of Chinese-English Bilinguals: Proficiency Matters , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Modeling of word translation: Activation flow from concepts to lexical items , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[3]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Phonological Units in Spoken Word Production: Insights from Cantonese , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system? , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[5]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  Masked Syllable Priming Effects in Word and Picture Naming in Chinese , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Sound-sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Laurence Labrune The Phonology of Japanese , 2012 .

[8]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[9]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  The functional unit of Japanese word naming: evidence from masked priming. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English , 2010, Cognition.

[11]  Andus Wing-Kuen Wong,et al.  What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning? , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Tao Wei,et al.  The contribution of orthography to spoken word production: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency in speech production: Further evidence for syllabic units at a post-lexical level , 2009 .

[14]  Katsuo Tamaoka,et al.  Japanese Mental Syllabary and Effects of Mora, Syllable, Bi-mora and Word Frequencies on Japanese Speech Production , 2009, Language and speech.

[15]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Andus Wing-Kuen Wong,et al.  Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Form encoding in Chinese word production does not involve morphemes , 2007 .

[18]  Johannes C. Ziegler,et al.  The role of orthography in speech production revisited , 2007, Cognition.

[19]  Takao Fushimi,et al.  The functional unit in phonological encoding: evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Modeling the control of phonological encoding in bilingual speakers , 2006, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[21]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production , 2006, Cognition.

[22]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Stem Complexity and Inflectional Encoding in Language Production , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  Clara C Levelt,et al.  Stress priming in picture naming: An SOA study , 2004, Brain and Language.

[25]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm , 2003 .

[27]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Shared phonological encoding processes and representations of languages in bilingual speakers , 2003 .

[28]  Dirk P. Janssen,et al.  Inflectional frames in language production , 2002 .

[29]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Word-Form Encoding in Mandarin Chinese as Assessed by the Implicit , 2002 .

[30]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  San Duanmu,et al.  The Phonology of Standard Chinese , 2001 .

[33]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Phonological Segments and Features as Planning Units in Speech Production , 1999 .

[34]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words , 1998 .

[36]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production : Verb-particle combinations , 1998 .

[37]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[38]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Serial Order in Planning the Production of Successive Morphemes of a Word , 1996 .

[39]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[40]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[41]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[42]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model , 1988 .

[43]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[44]  Peter Roach English Phonetics and Phonology:A Practical Course , 1983 .

[45]  W. Levelt,et al.  Planning and articulation in incremental word production: syllable-frequency effects in English. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  C. Gussenhoven The Phonology of Tone and Intonation: Index , 2004 .

[47]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The preparation of syllables in speech production , 2004 .

[48]  P. Ladefoged Vowels and consonants : an introduction to the sounds of languages , 2001 .

[49]  Tsutomu Akamatsu,et al.  Japanese phonology : a functional approach , 2000 .

[50]  Julio Santiago Implicit priming of picture naming: a theoretical andmethodological note on the implicit priming task , 2000 .

[51]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Morpheme frequency in speech production: Testing weaver , 1997 .

[52]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[53]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[54]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[55]  W. Levelt Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1989 .