Counting Homomorphisms to Cactus Graphs Modulo 2

A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is a function from V(G) to V(H) that preserves edges. Many combinatorial structures that arise in mathematics and computer science can be represented naturally as graph homomorphisms and as weighted sums of graph homomorphisms. In this paper, we study the complexity of counting homomorphisms modulo 2. The complexity of modular counting was introduced by Papadimitriou and Zachos and it has been pioneered by Valiant who famously introduced a problem for which counting modulo 7 is easy but counting modulo 2 is intractable. Modular counting provides a rich setting in which to study the structure of homomorphism problems. In this case, the structure of the graph H has a big influence on the complexity of the problem. Thus, our approach is graph-theoretic. We give a complete solution for the class of cactus graphs, which are connected graphs in which every edge belongs to at most one cycle. Cactus graphs arise in many applications such as the modelling of wireless sensor networks and the comparison of genomes. We show that, for some cactus graphs H, counting homomorphisms to H modulo 2 can be done in polynomial time. For every other fixed cactus graph H, the problem is complete for the complexity class +P which is a wide complexity class to which every problem in the polynomial hierarchy can be reduced (using randomised reductions). Determining which H lead to tractable problems can be done in polynomial time. Our result builds upon the work of Faben and Jerrum, who gave a dichotomy for the case in which H is a tree.

[1]  F Harary,et al.  On the Number of Husimi Trees: I. , 1953, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Nadia Creignou,et al.  Complexity of Generalized Satisfiability Counting Problems , 1996, Inf. Comput..

[3]  L. Lovász Operations with structures , 1967 .

[4]  Seinosuke Toda,et al.  PP is as Hard as the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy , 1991, SIAM J. Comput..

[5]  James H. McKay Another Proof of Cauchy's Group Theorem , 1959 .

[6]  John Faben The Complexity of Modular Counting in Constraint Satisfaction Problems. , 2012 .

[7]  Jaroslav Nesetril,et al.  On the complexity of H-coloring , 1990, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B.

[8]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  The Complexity of Parity Graph Homomorphism: An Initial Investigation , 2013, Theory Comput..

[9]  Ian Parberry,et al.  On the Construction of Parallel Computers from Various Bases of Boolean Functions , 1986, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Martin E. Dyer,et al.  The complexity of counting graph homomorphisms , 2000, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[11]  Martin E. Dyer,et al.  The Complexity of Weighted Boolean #CSP , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[12]  Andrei A. Bulatov,et al.  The complexity of partition functions , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Jin-Yi Cai,et al.  Graph Homomorphisms with Complex Values: A Dichotomy Theorem , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[14]  David Haussler,et al.  Cactus Graphs for Genome Comparisons , 2010, RECOMB.

[15]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Two remarks on the power of counting , 1983, Theoretical Computer Science.

[16]  Boaz Ben-Moshe,et al.  Efficient algorithms for center problems in cactus networks , 2007, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[17]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Accidental Algorithms , 2006, FOCS.

[18]  Michael Segal,et al.  Centdian Computation in Cactus Graphs , 2012, J. Graph Algorithms Appl..

[19]  Leslie Ann Goldberg,et al.  A Complexity Dichotomy for Partition Functions with Mixed Signs , 2008, SIAM J. Comput..

[20]  Leslie Ann Goldberg,et al.  The complexity of counting homomorphisms to cactus graphs modulo 2 , 2014, TOCT.