Concurrent determination of nanocrystal shape and amorphous phases in complex materials by diffraction scattering computed tomography

Advanced functional materials often contain multiple phases which are (nano)crystalline and/or amorphous. The spatial distribution of these phases and their properties, including nanocrystallite size and shape, often drives material function yet is difficult to obtain with current experimental techniques. This article describes the use of diffraction scattering computed tomography, which maps wide-angle scattering information onto sample space, to address this challenge. The wide-angle scattering signal contains information on both (nano)crystalline and amorphous phases. Rietveld refinement of reconstructed diffraction patterns is employed to determine anisotropic nanocrystal shapes. The background signal from refinements is used to identify contributing amorphous phases through multivariate curve resolution. Thus it is demonstrated that reciprocal space analysis in combination with diffraction scattering computed tomography is a very powerful tool for the complete analysis of complex multiphase materials such as energy devices.

[1]  J. S. Pedersen,et al.  Anisotropic Crystal Growth Kinetics of Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticles Synthesized in a Nonaqueous Medium , 2010 .

[2]  P. Bleuet,et al.  Diffraction/scattering computed tomography for three-dimensional characterization of multi-phase crystalline and amorphous materials , 2012 .

[3]  P. Bleuet,et al.  Probing the structure of heterogeneous diluted materials by diffraction tomography. , 2008, Nature materials.

[4]  Marco Di Michiel,et al.  Pair distribution function computed tomography , 2013, Nature Communications.

[5]  G. A. Lager,et al.  Polyhedral thermal expansion in the TiO 2 polymorphs; refinement of the crystal structures of rutile and brookite at high temperature , 1979 .

[6]  H. Birkedal,et al.  Modification of bone-like apatite nanoparticle size and growth kinetics by alizarin red S. , 2010, Nanoscale.

[7]  Romà Tauler,et al.  MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: New features and applications , 2015 .

[8]  H. Birkedal,et al.  Transparent Aggregates of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite , 2014 .

[9]  J. Gómez-Morales,et al.  Crystal Size, Morphology, and Growth Mechanism in Bio‐Inspired Apatite Nanocrystals , 2014 .

[10]  Romà Tauler,et al.  A graphical user-friendly interface for MCR-ALS: a new tool for multivariate curve resolution in MATLAB , 2005 .

[11]  Jackie Y. Ying,et al.  Role of Particle Size in Nanocrystalline TiO2-Based Photocatalysts , 1998 .

[12]  Simon J L Billinge,et al.  Beyond crystallography: the study of disorder, nanocrystallinity and crystallographically challenged materials with pair distribution functions. , 2004, Chemical communications.

[13]  Karena W. Chapman,et al.  Applications of principal component analysis to pair distribution function data , 2015 .

[14]  Dorota Koziej,et al.  Puzzling Mechanism behind a Simple Synthesis of Cobalt and Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles: In Situ Synchrotron X-ray Absorption and Diffraction Studies , 2014 .

[15]  K. Shankland,et al.  Characterisation of amorphous and nanocrystalline molecular materials by total scattering , 2010 .

[16]  Jerome B. Hastings,et al.  Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron X‐ray data from Al2O3 , 1987 .

[17]  H. Birkedal,et al.  MultiRef: software platform for Rietveld refinement of multiple powder diffractograms from in situ, scanning or diffraction tomography experiments , 2015 .

[18]  Andrew M. Beale,et al.  Progress towards five dimensional diffraction imaging of functional materials under process conditions , 2014 .

[19]  Rafal E. Dunin-Borkowski,et al.  Imaging Catalysts at Work: A Hierarchical Approach from the Macro‐ to the Meso‐ and Nano‐scale , 2013 .

[20]  Stuart R. Stock,et al.  Diffraction scattering computed tomography: a window into the structures of complex nanomaterials. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[21]  D. Koziej,et al.  Matching the organic and inorganic counterparts during nucleation and growth of copper-based nanoparticles – in situ spectroscopic studies , 2015 .

[22]  H. Birkedal,et al.  Influence of poly(acrylic acid) on apatite formation studied by in situ X‐ray diffraction using an X‐ray scattering reaction cell with high‐precision temperature control , 2012 .

[23]  C. Howard.  The Approximation of Asymmetric Neutron Powder Diffraction Peaks by Sums of Gaussians , 1982 .

[24]  Kun Liu,et al.  The role of brookite in mechanical activation of anatase-to-rutile transformation of nanocrystalline TiO2: An XRD and Raman spectroscopy investigation , 2011 .

[25]  F De Carlo,et al.  High energy X-ray scattering tomography applied to bone. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  L. Karanović,et al.  Crystal structure of cobalt-substituted calcium hydroxyapatite nanopowders prepared by hydrothermal processing , 2010 .

[27]  Stuart R. Stock,et al.  Diffraction computed tomography reveals the inner structure of complex biominerals , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[28]  J. Hanson,et al.  Formation of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and vacancy ordering: An in situ X-ray powder diffraction study , 2007 .