Research participants’ attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information

Respecting the confidentiality of personal data contributed to genomic studies is an important issue for researchers using genomic sequencing in humans. Although most studies adhere to rules of confidentiality, there are different conceptions of confidentiality and why it is important. The resulting ambiguity obscures what is at stake when making tradeoffs between data protection and other goals in research, such as transparency, reciprocity, and public benefit. Few studies have examined why participants in genomic research care about how their information is used. To explore this topic, we conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 30 participants in two National Institutes of Health research protocols using genomic sequencing. Our results show that research participants value confidentiality as a form of control over information about themselves. To the individuals we interviewed, control was valued as a safeguard against discrimination in a climate of uncertainty about future uses of individual genome data. Attitudes towards data sharing were related to the goals of research and details of participants’ personal lives. Expectations of confidentiality, trust in researchers, and a desire to advance science were common reasons for willingness to share identifiable data with investigators. Nearly, all participants were comfortable sharing personal data that had been de-identified. These findings suggest that views about confidentiality and data sharing are highly nuanced and are related to the perceived benefits of joining a research study.

[1]  M. Bamshad,et al.  Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[2]  K. Devers,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. , 2007, Health services research.

[3]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants , 2010, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  Wendy A. Wolf,et al.  Public and Biobank Participant Attitudes toward Genetic Research Participation and Data Sharing , 2010, Public Health Genomics.

[5]  R. Gallagher,et al.  From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Erika Check Hayden,et al.  Geneticists push for global data-sharing , 2013, Nature.

[7]  Alain Levêque,et al.  Ethics, privacy and the legal framework governing medical data: opportunities or threats for biomedical and public health research? , 2013, Archives of Public Health.

[8]  Zhen Lin,et al.  Genomic Research and Human Subject Privacy , 2004, Science.

[9]  N. Kass,et al.  Disclosure of personal medical information: differences among parents and affected adults for genetic and nongenetic conditions. , 2005, Genetic testing.

[10]  Groups experiment with digital tools for patient consent. , 2013, JAMA.

[11]  Joan Scott,et al.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  Konrad J. Karczewski,et al.  Evidence That Personal Genome Testing Enhances Student Learning in a Course on Genomics and Personalized Medicine , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Y. Trakadis,et al.  Patient-controlled encrypted genomic data: an approach to advance clinical genomics , 2012, BMC Medical Genomics.

[14]  Delays in updates to ethics guidelines for research spark concern , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[15]  Russ B Altman,et al.  Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. , 2004, Science.

[16]  Kelly Edwards,et al.  The haystack is made of needles. , 2013, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.

[17]  L. Biesecker,et al.  Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research , 2012, BMC Medical Genomics.

[18]  S. Fullerton,et al.  Glad You Asked: Participants' Opinions of Re-Consent for DbGap Data Submission , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[19]  Alexander F. Wilson,et al.  Research in Genomic Medicine the Clinseq Project: Piloting Large-scale Genome Sequencing for Material Supplemental , 2009 .

[20]  Julie C. Sapp,et al.  Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children , 2014, Clinical genetics.

[21]  Eran Halperin,et al.  Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference , 2013, Science.

[22]  M R Anderlik,et al.  Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new science? , 2001, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[23]  H. Wichmann,et al.  The Privacy-Reciprocity Connection in Biobanking: Comparing German with UK Strategies , 2012, Public Health Genomics.

[24]  J. Kaye The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. , 2012, Annual review of genomics and human genetics (Print).

[25]  W. Ricciardi,et al.  Revision of the European Data Protection Directive: opportunity or threat for public health monitoring? , 2011, European journal of public health.

[26]  J. Shendure,et al.  Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: A qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.