Does Sequence of Presentation Matter in Reading Comprehension? A Model Based Analysis of Semantic Concept Network Growth during Reading

Though not completely natural, reading is one of the most common means of learning for modern humans. In this paper we present an interesting study how the presentation sequence of concepts during reading might impact the semantic network of meaning generated. Text comprehension can be viewed as an incremental and episodic process. Concepts which are recognized are subsequently integrated into the background knowledge represented by a semantic network. We present a reading experiment in which groups of readers are presented same sample texts but in varying order of sentences to simulate different sequences of concept presentation. For comprehensive analysis, we also use a new computational model of the segmentation and integration process and summarize the learning. We then compare the resulting summary networks of the reader groups revealing a number of interesting observations.

[1]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[2]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .

[3]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Advances in Text Comprehension: Model, Process and Development , 2008 .

[4]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[6]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[7]  Javed I. Khan,et al.  Concept Learning in Text Comprehension , 2010, Brain Informatics.

[8]  Janet K. Swaffar,et al.  Reading For Meaning: An Integrated Approach to Language Learning , 1990 .

[9]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  G. McKoon,et al.  The readiness is all: The functionality of memory‐based text processing , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Early Semantic Networks , 2009, Psychological science.

[12]  Wolfgang Schnotz On the relation of dual coding and mental models in graphics comprehension , 1993 .

[13]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[16]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Knowledge Organization and Text Organization , 1987 .

[17]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition with Static and Animated Pictures in Computer-Based Learning. , 1996 .

[18]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading: Models of the reading process , 1988 .

[19]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[20]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Is There Preferential Attachment in the Growth of Early Semantic Noun Networks , 2008 .

[21]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .