Cascading to Equilibrium: Hydraulic Computation of Equilibria in Resource Selection Games

Drawing intuition from a (physical) hydraulic system, we present a novel framework, constructively showing the existence of a strong Nash equilibrium in resource selection games with nonatomic players, the coincidence of strong equilibria and Nash equilibria in such games, and the invariance of the cost of each given resource across all Nash equilibria. Our proofs allow for explicit calculation of Nash equilibrium and for explicit and direct calculation of the resulting (invariant) costs of resources, and do not hinge on any fixed-point theorem, on the Minimax theorem or any equivalent result, on the existence of a potential, or on linear programming. A generalization of resource selection games, called resource selection games with I.D.-dependent weighting, is defined, and the results are extended to this family, showing that while resource costs are no longer invariant across Nash equilibria in games of this family, they are nonetheless invariant across all strong Nash equilibria, drawing a novel fundamental connection between group deviation and I.D.-congestion. A natural application of the resulting machinery to a large class of constraint-satisfaction problems is also described.

[1]  D. Monderer,et al.  Solution-based congestion games , 2006 .

[2]  D. Schmeidler Equilibrium points of nonatomic games , 1973 .

[3]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[4]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Social optimality and cooperation in nonatomic congestion games , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[5]  I. Fisher Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices , 1893 .

[6]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[7]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Generic Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Large Crowding Games , 2000, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[9]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Noncooperative Market Allocation and the Formation of Downtown , 2014, ArXiv.

[10]  Robert J. Aumann,et al.  16. Acceptable Points in General Cooperative n-Person Games , 1959 .

[11]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  How bad is selfish routing? , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[12]  Marek Mikolaj Kaminski,et al.  'Hydraulic' rationing , 2000, Math. Soc. Sci..

[13]  Martin Hoefer,et al.  Computing Pure Nash and Strong Equilibria in Bottleneck Congestion Games , 2010, ESA.

[14]  P. Hall On Representatives of Subsets , 1935 .

[15]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Worst-case Equilibria , 1999, STACS.

[16]  I. Milchtaich,et al.  Congestion Games with Player-Specific Payoff Functions , 1996 .

[17]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Strong equilibrium in cost sharing connection games , 2007, EC '07.

[18]  Ron Holzman,et al.  Network structure and strong equilibrium in route selection games , 2003, Math. Soc. Sci..

[19]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Network Topology and the Efficiency of Equilibrium , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Strong and Correlated Strong Equilibria in Monotone Congestion Games , 2006, WINE.

[21]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Studies in the Economics of Transportation. , 1956 .

[22]  O. Rozenfeld Strong Equilibrium in Congestion Games , 2007 .

[23]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[24]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Topological Conditions for Uniqueness of Equilibrium in Networks , 2005, Math. Oper. Res..

[25]  Ariel Orda,et al.  Competitive routing in multiuser communication networks , 1993, TNET.