Are Mental Biases Responsible for the Perceived Comfort Advantage in “Green” Buildings?

Previous research has shown that merely calling an indoor environment environmentally certified will make people favor that environment over a conventional alternative. In this paper we explore whether this effect depends on participants deliberately comparing the two environments, and whether different reasons behind the certification influence the magnitude of the effect. In Experiment 1, participants in a between-subjects design assigned higher comfort ratings to an indoor environment that had been labeled “environmentally certified” in comparison with the exact same indoor environment that was unlabeled, suggesting that the effect arises even when participants do not compare the two environments when making their estimates. The results from Experiment 2 indicate that climate change mitigation (as the reason for the certification) is a slightly better trigger of the effect compared to climate change adaptation. The results suggest that studies on psychological effects of “green” buildings should experimentally control for the influence from participants’ judgmental biases.

[1]  D. Victor,et al.  The Climate Threat We Can Beat , 2012 .

[2]  Zhonghua Gou,et al.  Indoor Environmental Satisfaction in Two LEED Offices and its Implications in Green Interior Design , 2012 .

[3]  Kevin M. Kniffin,et al.  You Taste What You See: Organic Labels Bias Taste Perceptions , 2013 .

[4]  Weimin Wang,et al.  Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization , 2005 .

[5]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Toward Sustainable Consumption: Two New Perspectives , 1997 .

[6]  Mickael Derbez,et al.  A 3-year follow-up of indoor air quality and comfort in two energy-efficient houses , 2014 .

[7]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  Occupant perception of “green” buildings : Distinguishing physical and psychological factors , 2017 .

[8]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  An eco-label effect in the built environment: Performance and comfort effects of labeling a light source environmentally friendly , 2015 .

[9]  S. I. Rosenfeld.  Worker productivity : hidden HVAC cost , 1989 .

[10]  Mickael Derbez,et al.  Indoor air quality and comfort in seven newly built, energy-efficient houses in France , 2014 .

[11]  A. Mohamed,et al.  A comparative study on the energy policies in Japan and Malaysia in fulfilling their nations’ obligations towards the Kyoto Protocol , 2009 .

[12]  Leah Zagreus,et al.  Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings , 2006 .

[13]  Hasim Altan,et al.  A comparison of the occupant comfort in a conventional high-rise office block and a contemporary env , 2011 .

[14]  Linda Too,et al.  Occupier perceptions of green workplace environment: the Australian experience , 2009 .

[15]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review , 2006 .

[16]  Ali GhaffarianHoseini,et al.  Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: a review of current theories, implementations and challenges , 2013 .

[17]  Borong Lin,et al.  Comparative study on the indoor environment quality of green office buildings in China with a long-term field measurement and investigation , 2015 .

[18]  Fabrizio Benedetti,et al.  A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  Dorota Chwieduk,et al.  Towards sustainable-energy buildings , 2003 .

[20]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[21]  David A. Coley,et al.  The Effect of Low Ventilation Rates on the Cognitive Function of a Primary School Class , 2007 .

[22]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: a new analysis , 2016 .

[23]  Bahram Moshfegh,et al.  Evaluating indoor environment of a retrofitted multi-family building with improved energy performance in Sweden , 2015 .

[24]  A Hedge,et al.  Occupant comfort and health in green and conventional university buildings. , 2014, Work.

[25]  Pertti Pasanen,et al.  Primary energy performance and perceived indoor environment quality in Finnish low-energy and conventional houses , 2015 .

[26]  Kenneth P. Uhl,et al.  Influence of Beer Brand Identification on Taste Perception , 1964 .

[27]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[28]  Bahram Moshfegh,et al.  Energy demand and indoor climate in a low energy building—changed control strategies and boundary conditions , 2006 .

[29]  Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed,et al.  Can self-evaluation measure the effect of IEQ on productivity? A review of literature , 2017 .

[30]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Climate change 2007: Lifting the taboo on adaptation , 2007, Nature.

[31]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Personal factors in thermal comfort assessment: clothing properties and metabolic heat production , 2002 .

[32]  E. Keskitalo.  Climate Change and Globalization in the Arctic: An Integrated Approach to Vulnerability Assessment , 2012 .

[33]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[34]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  The green halo: Mechanisms and limits of the eco-label effect , 2015 .

[35]  Han-Hsi Liang,et al.  Satisfaction of occupants toward indoor environment quality of certified green office buildings in Taiwan , 2014 .

[36]  André Coelho,et al.  Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings. , 2012, Waste management.

[37]  P. Wargocki,et al.  Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments , 2011 .

[38]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? , 2012 .

[39]  Lena Vogler,et al.  Sustainable Construction Green Building Design And Delivery , 2016 .

[40]  L. Armitage,et al.  Green offices in Australia: a user perception survey , 2011 .

[41]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Recycling on Sustainability of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Thailand , 2013 .

[42]  M Frontczak,et al.  Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. , 2012, Indoor air.

[43]  Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed,et al.  The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings , 2016 .

[44]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Changes in productivity, psychological wellbeing and physical wellbeing from working in a 'green' building. , 2014, Work.

[45]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials , 2012 .

[46]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings , 2013 .

[47]  Joseph G. Allen,et al.  Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[48]  W. Fisk.  HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY GAINS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[49]  Magnus Bonde,et al.  A post-occupancy evaluation of a green rated and conventional on-campus residence hall , 2015 .

[50]  R. Cole,et al.  Influence of occupants' knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour , 2009 .

[51]  F. Fernqvist,et al.  Consumer preferences for domestic and organically labelled vegetables in Sweden , 2007 .

[52]  Zhonghua Gou,et al.  Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable , 2013 .

[53]  Klaus-Peter Wiedmann,et al.  Tasting green: An experimental design for investigating consumer perception of organic wine , 2014 .

[54]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  Who Needs Cream and Sugar When There Is Eco-Labeling? Taste and Willingness to Pay for “Eco-Friendly” Coffee , 2013, PloS one.