Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors.

How do top-down factors (e.g., task expectancy) and bottom-up factors (e.g., task recency) interact to produce an overall level of task readiness? This question was addressed by factorially manipulating task expectancy and task repetition in a task-switching paradigm. The effects of expectancy and repetition on response time tended to interact underadditively, but only because the traditional binary task-repetition variable lumps together all switch trials, ignoring variation in task lag. When the task-recency variable was scaled continuously, all 4 experiments instead showed additivity between expectancy and recency. The results indicated that expectancy and recency influence different stages of mental processing. One specific possibility (the configuration-execution model) is that task expectancy affects the time required to configure upcoming central operations, whereas task recency affects the time required to actually execute those central operations.

[1]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[2]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[3]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. , 1993 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning. I, Locus of practice effects in speeded choice tasks , 1991 .

[6]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. , 1991 .

[7]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[8]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[9]  B. Forrin,et al.  Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories , 1974 .

[10]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space , 1999 .

[11]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  P. Bertelson.  S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[13]  Robert Gottsdanker,et al.  21 The Ubiquitous Role of Preparation , 1980 .

[14]  E Ruthruff,et al.  Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  A. Sanders,et al.  Overlapping stage models and reaction time additivity: effects of the activation equation. , 1995, Acta psychologica.

[16]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[17]  S. Los,et al.  Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[18]  David A. Balota,et al.  Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding , 1983 .

[19]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[20]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[21]  N. Meiran.  Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[22]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[23]  D. A. Taylor,et al.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[26]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[27]  D. Balota,et al.  Automatic and attentional priming in young and older adults: reevaluation of the two-process model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  T Kleinsorge,et al.  Response repetition benefits and costs. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[30]  H. Pashler,et al.  Procedural Learning : 1 . Locus of Practice Effects in Speeded Choice Tasks , 1991 .

[31]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[32]  Randall S. Hansen,et al.  The effects of stimulus sequence and probability on perceptual processing , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[34]  William Epstein,et al.  Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. , 1960 .