Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate

For normally distributed data, determination of the appropriate sample size requires a knowledge of the variance. Because of the uncertainty in the planning phase, two-stage procedures are attractive where the variance is reestimated from a subsample and the sample size is adjusted if necessary. From a regulatory viewpoint, preserving blindness and maintaining the ability to calculate or control the type I error rate are essential. Recently, a number of proposals have been made for sample size adjustment procedures in the t-test situation. Unfortunately, none of these methods satisfy both these requirements. We show through analytical computations that the type I error rate of the t-test is not affected if simple blind variance estimators are used for sample size recalculation. Furthermore, the results for the expected power of the procedures demonstrate that the methods are effective in ensuring the desired power even under initial misspecification of the variance. A method is discussed that can be applied in a more general setting and that assumes analysis with a permutation test. This procedure maintains the significance level for any design situation and arbitrary blind sample size recalculation strategy.

[1]  T. Friede,et al.  A comparison of methods for adaptive sample size adjustment , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  W J Shih,et al.  Modifying the design of ongoing trials without unblinding. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  A. Gould,et al.  Sample size re-estimation without unblinding for normally distributed outcomes with unknown variance , 1992 .

[4]  B. M. Seelbinder,et al.  On Stein's Two-stage Sampling Scheme , 1953 .

[5]  J. Erikssen,et al.  A method for determining the size of internal pilot studies. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  A Whitehead,et al.  Mid-trial design reviews for sequential clinical trials. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  W J Shih,et al.  Design for sample size re-estimation with interim data for double-blind clinical trials with binary outcomes. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  E. Ernst,et al.  Efficacy of kava extract for treating anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2000, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[9]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Blinded Sample Size Reestimation in Multiarmed Clinical Trials , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen Senn,et al.  Statistical Issues in Drug Development , 1997 .

[11]  K E Muller,et al.  Exact test size and power of a Gaussian error linear model for an internal pilot study. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  J Singer,et al.  A method for determining the size of internal pilot studies. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  D. Zucker,et al.  Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  C Jennison,et al.  Estimating the sample size for a t-test using an internal pilot. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  T. Friede,et al.  Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  W J Shih,et al.  Re-evaluating design specifications of longitudinal clinical trials without unblinding when the key response is rate of change. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  A. Lawrence Gould,et al.  Discussion of papers of session 3: Bayes/empirical bayes , 1992 .

[18]  C. Stein A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the Variance , 1945 .

[19]  A L Gould,et al.  Interim analyses for monitoring clinical trials that do not materially affect the type I error rate. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  J. Ph,et al.  Dose response studies. II. Analysis and interpretation. , 1995 .

[21]  K E Muller,et al.  Controlling test size while gaining the benefits of an internal pilot design. , 2001, Biometrics.

[22]  M. Proschan,et al.  Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naive t-test. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  V W Berger,et al.  Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  J. Wittes,et al.  The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  A. Gould Planning and revising the sample size for a trial. , 1995, Statistics in Medicine.

[26]  John Whitehead,et al.  Sample size review in a head injury trial with ordered categorical responses. , 1998 .

[27]  S. Day,et al.  Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  On the inappropriateness of an EM algorithm based procedure for blinded sample size re‐estimation , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Zhenming Shun,et al.  Sample Size Reestimation in Clinical Trials , 2001 .

[30]  Jack Moshman,et al.  A Method for Selecting the Size of the Initial Sample in Stein's Two Sample Procedure , 1958 .

[31]  J. Long,et al.  Blinded sample size re-estimation with unequal variances and center effects in clinical trials , 1998 .

[32]  M A Proschan,et al.  An improved double sampling procedure based on the variance. , 2000, Biometrics.