Unwinding Rotations Improves User Comfort with Immersive Telepresence Robots

We propose unwinding the rotations experienced by the user of an immersive telepresence robot to improve comfort and reduce VR sickness of the user. By immersive telepresence we refer to a situation where a 360° camera on top of a mobile robot is streaming video and audio into a head-mounted display worn by a remote user possibly far away. Thus, it enables the user to be present at the robot’s location, look around by turning the head and communicate with people near the robot. By unwinding the rotations of the camera frame, the user’s viewpoint is not changed when the robot rotates. The user can change her viewpoint only by physically rotating in her local setting; as visual rotation without the corresponding vestibular stimulation is a major source of VR sickness, physical rotation by the user is expected to reduce VR sickness. We implemented unwinding the rotations for a simulated robot traversing a virtual environment and ran a user study (N=34) comparing unwinding rotations to user’s viewpoint turning when the robot turns. Our results show that the users found unwound rotations more preferable and comfortable and that it reduced their level of VR sickness. We also present further results about the users’ path integration capabilities, viewing directions, and subjective observations of the robot’s speed and distances to simulated people and objects.

[1]  Yang Hong,et al.  The effect of chair type on users' viewing experience for 360-degree video , 2018, VRST.

[2]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[3]  Frédéric Merienne,et al.  New VR Navigation Techniques to Reduce Cybersickness , 2017, ERVR.

[4]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  How automatic speed control based on distance affects user behaviours in telepresence robot navigation within dense conference-like environments , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[6]  SwiVRChair: A Motorized Swivel Chair to Nudge Users' Orientation for 360 Degree Storytelling in Virtual Reality , 2016, CHI.

[7]  Matthew Rueben,et al.  Long-Term, in-the-Wild Study of Feedback about Speech Intelligibility for K-12 Students Attending Class via a Telepresence Robot , 2021, ICMI.

[8]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Bodies in motion: mobility, presence, and task awareness in telepresence , 2014, CHI.

[9]  W. Bles,et al.  Motion sickness. , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[10]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Ben D. Lawson,et al.  Motion Sickness Symptomatology and Origins , 2014, Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..

[13]  S. Hu,et al.  Systematic investigation of physiological correlates of motion sickness induced by viewing an optokinetic rotating drum. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Human Perception-Optimized Planning for Comfortable VR-Based Telepresence , 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[15]  Paweł Strojny,et al.  Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Stephen Palmisano,et al.  Effects of dynamic field-of-view restriction on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality , 2020, Virtual Reality.

[17]  Markku Turunen,et al.  The Effect of Camera Height, Actor Behavior, and Viewer Position on the User Experience of 360° Videos , 2019, 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[18]  Eunhee Chang,et al.  Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements , 2020, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Regis Kopper,et al.  Visually-Induced Motion Sickness Reduction via Static and Dynamic Rest Frames , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[20]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Analysis of User Preferences for Robot Motions in Immersive Telepresence , 2021, 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[23]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Do We Need to Walk for Effective Virtual Reality Navigation? Physical Rotations Alone May Suffice , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[24]  J. Golding Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[25]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Telepresence , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Margaret Volante Qualitative research. , 2008, Nurse researcher.

[27]  Douglas Lanman,et al.  Reverse Pass-Through VR , 2021, SIGGRAPH Emerging Technologies.

[28]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  To Sit or Not to Sit in VR: Analyzing Influences and (Dis)Advantages of Posture and Embodied Interaction , 2021, Comput..

[29]  Alexander Kulik,et al.  On the Usage of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire for Virtual Reality Research , 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW).

[30]  Leonard McMillan,et al.  Post-rendering 3D warping , 1997, SI3D.

[31]  Séamas Weech,et al.  Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Mattia Poggiani,et al.  Humanoids at Work: The WALK-MAN Robot in a Postearthquake Scenario , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[33]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Charles B. Owen,et al.  Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness , 2014, UIST.

[35]  Weihua Sheng,et al.  Human–Robot Collaborative Control in a Virtual-Reality-Based Telepresence System , 2020, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[36]  Sven Koenig,et al.  Lazy Theta*: Any-Angle Path Planning and Path Length Analysis in 3D , 2010, SOCS.

[37]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  Mind the Gap: The Underrepresentation of Female Participants and Authors in Virtual Reality Research , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[38]  Barry Peterson,et al.  Spatial Orientation, Wayfinding, and Representation , 2014, Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..

[39]  Renann G. Baldovino,et al.  Akibot: A Telepresence Robot for Medical Teleconsultation , 2018, 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology,Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM).

[40]  Carl Machover,et al.  Virtual reality , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[41]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Li Rui,et al.  Comparing Human-Robot Proxemics between Virtual Reality and the Real World , 2018 .

[44]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[45]  Jean Botev,et al.  Immersive Robotic Telepresence for Remote Educational Scenarios , 2021, Sustainability.

[46]  Mel Slater,et al.  Using Presence Questionnaires in Reality , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[47]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Comfort and Sickness while Virtually Aboard an Autonomous Telepresence Robot , 2021, EuroXR.

[48]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  “Wait, Can You Move the Robot?”: Examining Telepresence Robot Use in Collaborative Teams , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[49]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[50]  Paul Bremner,et al.  Towards an immersive user interface for waypoint navigation of a mobile robot , 2020, ArXiv.