Calorimetric study of a series of designed repeat proteins: Modular structure and modular folding

Repeat proteins comprise tandem arrays of a small structural motif. Their structure is defined and stabilized by interactions between residues that are close in the primary sequence. Several studies have investigated whether their structural modularity translates into modular thermodynamic properties. Tetratricopeptide repeat proteins (TPRs) are a class in which the repeated unit is a 34 amino acid helix‐turn‐helix motif. In this work, we use differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to study the equilibrium stability of a series of TPR proteins with different numbers of an identical consensus repeat, from 2 to 20, CTPRa2 to CTPRa20. The DSC data provides direct evidence that the folding/unfolding transition of CTPR proteins does not fit a two‐state folding model. Our results confirm and expand earlier studies on TPR proteins, which showed that apparent two‐state unfolding curves are better fit by linear statistical mechanics models: 1D Ising models in which each repeat is treated as an independent folding unit.

[1]  Tommi Kajander,et al.  A new folding paradigm for repeat proteins. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Sophie E Jackson,et al.  The folding and design of repeat proteins: reaching a consensus. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  L. Regan,et al.  Non-random-coil behavior as a consequence of extensive PPII structure in the denatured state. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  P. Hieter,et al.  Tetratrico peptide repeat interactions: to TPR or not to TPR? , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[5]  Lynne Regan,et al.  TPR proteins: the versatile helix. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  B. Zimm,et al.  Theory of the Phase Transition between Helix and Random Coil in Polypeptide Chains , 1959 .

[7]  Sophie E Jackson,et al.  A recurring theme in protein engineering: the design, stability and folding of repeat proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  Sophie E Jackson,et al.  Local and long-range stability in tandemly arrayed tetratricopeptide repeats. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  P. Privalov,et al.  A thermodynamic approach to the problem of stabilization of globular protein structure: a calorimetric study. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Yong Xiong,et al.  Design of stable alpha-helical arrays from an idealized TPR motif. , 2003, Structure.

[11]  P. Privalov.  Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. , 1979, Advances in protein chemistry.

[12]  Doug Barrick,et al.  An experimentally determined protein folding energy landscape. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  L. Regan,et al.  Mapping the energy landscape of repeat proteins using NMR-detected hydrogen exchange. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Doug Barrick,et al.  Repeat-protein folding: new insights into origins of cooperativity, stability, and topology. , 2008, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[15]  J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz.  Differential scanning calorimetry of proteins. , 1995, Sub-cellular biochemistry.

[16]  P. Privalov,et al.  Energetics of protein structure. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.

[17]  Aitziber L Cortajarena,et al.  Repeat motions and backbone flexibility in designed proteins with different numbers of identical consensus tetratricopeptide repeats. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[18]  Doug Barrick,et al.  Limits of cooperativity in a structurally modular protein: response of the Notch ankyrin domain to analogous alanine substitutions in each repeat. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  D. Barrick,et al.  Studies of the ankyrin repeats of the Drosophila melanogaster Notch receptor. 2. Solution stability and cooperativity of unfolding. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[20]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Differential Scanning Calorimetry , 2009 .

[21]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  BPPred: A Web‐based computational tool for predicting biophysical parameters of proteins , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  M. Carlson,et al.  The N-Terminal TPR Region Is the Functional Domain of SSN6, a Nuclear Phosphoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  E. Ising.  Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[24]  C. Pace,et al.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: Relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[25]  J. Jauniaux,et al.  Identification of a Novel Cellular TPR-Containing Protein, SGT, That Interacts with the Nonstructural Protein NS1 of Parvovirus H-1 , 1998, Journal of Virology.

[26]  Tommi Kajander,et al.  Consensus design as a tool for engineering repeat proteins. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.