Contingent versus routine third‐trimester screening for late fetal growth restriction

To evaluate the use of third‐trimester ultrasound screening for late fetal growth restriction (FGR) on a contingent basis, according to risk accrued in the second trimester, in an unselected population.

[1]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 19–24 weeks , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  N. Medley,et al.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 30–34 weeks , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 35–37 weeks , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35–37 weeks , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30–34 weeks , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  A. Papageorghiou,et al.  Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Update on the Diagnosis and Classification of Fetal Growth Restriction and Proposal of a Stage-Based Management Protocol , 2014, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[10]  E. Gratacós,et al.  First‐trimester screening for early and late small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  G. D'ottavio,et al.  Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[12]  Asad Malik,et al.  Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study , 2013, BMJ.

[13]  A. Baschat,et al.  Emergence of Late-Onset Placental Dysfunction: Relationship to the Change in Uterine Artery Blood Flow Resistance between the First and Third Trimesters , 2012, American Journal of Perinatology.

[14]  A. Souka,et al.  Performance of third‐trimester ultrasound for prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  G. Pilu,et al.  Increased uterine artery pulsatility index at 34 weeks and outcome of pregnancy , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  Francesc Figueras,et al.  Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management. , 2011, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  G. Dekker,et al.  Risk factors for small‐for‐gestational‐age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study , 2010, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  D. Wright,et al.  Prediction of Small-for-Gestation Neonates from Biophysical and Biochemical Markers at 11–13 Weeks , 2010, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[19]  A. Caughey,et al.  Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Ying Lu,et al.  A non-inferiority test of areas under two parametric ROC curves. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[21]  C. Le Ray,et al.  Routine versus indicated third trimester ultrasound: is a randomized trial feasible? , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[22]  F. Figueras,et al.  Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[23]  M. Loane,et al.  Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  Aeilko H. Zwinderman,et al.  Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[25]  P G Lindqvist,et al.  Does antenatal identification of small‐for‐gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  J. Dornan,et al.  A Randomized Trial Using Ultrasound to Identify the High‐Risk Fetus in a Low‐Risk Population , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  A. Baschat,et al.  The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[28]  F. Figueras,et al.  References intervals for fetal biometrical parameters. , 2002, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[29]  M. Mugford,et al.  British National Health Service's and women's costs of antenatal ultrasound screening and follow‐up tests , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  S. Cicero,et al.  Screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[31]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[32]  S. Cnattingius,et al.  Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population‐based birthweight standards , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[33]  Jean-Marie Moutquin,et al.  The Classification and Diagnosis of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) , 2001, Hypertension in pregnancy.

[34]  C. Ananth,et al.  Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: a cost-benefit analysis. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  A. Gregg,et al.  “Normal” Umbilical Arterial and Venous Acid—Base and Blood Gas Values , 1993, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[37]  K. Rosenberg,et al.  An audit of the detection and management of small‐for‐gestational age babies , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[38]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  L. Bakketeig,et al.  RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC SCREENING IN PREGNANCY , 1984, The Lancet.

[40]  A. H. Adam,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF RADIOLOGICAL ESTIMATES OF GESTATIONAL AGE USING EARLY FETAL CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH MEASUREMENTS BY ULTRASOUND AS A BASIS FOR COMPARISON , 1979, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[41]  R. Maclennan,et al.  DIETARY FIBRE, TRANSIT-TIME, FÆCAL BACTERIA, STEROIDS, AND COLON CANCER IN TWO SCANDINAVIAN POPULATIONS Report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer Intestinal Microecology Group , 1977, The Lancet.

[42]  J Figueras,et al.  Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. , 2008, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[43]  J. Neilson,et al.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation). , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[44]  L. Kean,et al.  Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population , 1996 .

[45]  T. Moore,et al.  A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.