A new model to identify the productivity of theses in terms of articles using co-word analysis

A thesis defense should be considered as not the end but the starting point for scientific communication flow. How many articles truly extend doctoral research? This article proposes a new model to automatically identify the productivity of theses in terms of article publications. We evaluate the use of the co-word analysis technique to establish relationships among 401 doctoral theses and 2,211 articles journal articles published by students in a graduate program at a Brazilian National Nuclear Research Institution (IPEN-CNEN/SP).To identify the relationship between a thesis and an article published by the same author, we used co-descriptor pairs from a controlled vocabulary. To validate the proposed model, a survey was applied to a random sample of theses authors (n = 128, response rate of 79%), thus establishing a minimum threshold of three coincident co-descriptors to identify the relationship between theses and articles. The agreement level between an author′s opinion and the automatic method was 86.9%, with a sampling error of 7.36%, which indicates an acceptable level of accuracy. Differences between the related or nonrelated distributions of articles were also demonstrated, as was a reduction in the median lag time to publication and the supervisor′s influence on student productivity.

[1]  J. Law,et al.  Mapping acidification research: A test of the co-word method , 1992, Scientometrics.

[2]  Björn Hammarfelt,et al.  Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields , 2011, Scientometrics.

[3]  Lars H. Breimer Swedish biomedical PhD examination: an international forum and a proposed procedure for Europe , 2009, Scientometrics.

[4]  Qingqiang Wu,et al.  Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting , 2011, Scientometrics.

[5]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge , 2011, Scientometrics.

[6]  E Mouillet,et al.  Publication pattern of medical theses, France, 1993–98 , 2001, Medical education.

[7]  D. Birolini,et al.  Graduate education at the faculty of medicine of the University of Sao Paulo: quo vadis? , 2005, Clinics.

[8]  van Raan,et al.  Advanced bibliometric methods to assess research performance and scientific development: basic principles and recent practical applications , 1993 .

[9]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Lidija Bilić-Zulle,et al.  Publishing scientific papers based on Master's and Ph.D. theses from a small scientific community: case study of Croatian medical schools. , 2003, Croatian medical journal.

[11]  Lars H. Breimer,et al.  A longitudinal and cross-sectional study of Swedish biomedical PhD processes 1991–2009 with emphasis on international and gender aspects , 2010, Scientometrics.

[12]  John Whittaker,et al.  Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords and Co-word Analysis , 1989 .

[13]  Hui-Ling Wang,et al.  A co-word analysis of digital library field in China , 2012, Scientometrics.

[14]  Roberto Marcondes Cesar Junior,et al.  scriptLattes: an open-source knowledge extraction system from the Lattes platform , 2009, Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society.

[15]  J. Lane Let's make science metrics more scientific , 2010, Nature.

[16]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[17]  Mumtaz A. Anwar,et al.  From doctoral dissertation to publication , 2004, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Ang Li,et al.  Research on the semantic-based co-word analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[19]  Lei Cui,et al.  Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis , 2011, Scientometrics.

[20]  Qin He,et al.  Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[21]  Félix de Moya Anegón,et al.  Co-word based thematic analysis of renewable energy (1990–2010) , 2013, Scientometrics.

[23]  Qian-Jin Zong,et al.  Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[24]  W. A. Turner,et al.  PACKAGING INFORMATION FOR PEER REVIEW : NEW CO-WORD ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES , 1988 .

[25]  Rogério Mugnaini,et al.  A new indicator for international visibility: exploring Brazilian scientific community , 2011, Scientometrics.

[26]  Hakan Yaman,et al.  PhD theses in Turkish sports sciences: A study covering the years 1988–2002 , 2007, Scientometrics.

[27]  The Rationalization of Academic Work and Careers: Ongoing Transformations of the Profession and Policy Challenges , 2009 .

[28]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  The Google effect in doctoral theses , 2012, Scientometrics.

[29]  Wade M. Lee Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995 , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Adolfo Alonso Arroyo,et al.  Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  W. Curioso,et al.  Characteristics and publication patterns of theses from a Peruvian medical school. , 2010, Health information and libraries journal.