Metaphyseal debonding of the Corail collarless cementless stem: REPORT OF 18 CASES AND CASE‐CONTROL STUDY

Aims The Corail stem has good long‐term results. After four years of using this stem, we have detected a small group of patients who have presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of this complication, to delineate the characteristics of patients presenting with this complication and to compare these patients with asymptomatic controls to determine any important predisposing factors. Patients and Methods Of 855 Corail collarless cementless stems implanted for osteoarthritis, 18 presented with symptomatic metaphyseal debonding. A control group of 74 randomly selected patients was assembled. Clinical and radiological parameters were measured and a logistic regression model was created to evaluate factors associated with metaphyseal debonding. Results The prevalence of this complication was 2.1% in our series. In the multivariable model, the presence of a Dorr B‐type proximal femur was associated with metaphyseal debonding (odds ratio (OR) 10.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31 to 49.97, p = 0.002), as was a body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (OR 6.85, 95% CI 1.06 to 44.28, p = 0.04). Smaller stems and the use of a polyethylene acetabular liner appeared to be protective when compared with metal and ceramic setting hard‐on‐hard bearings. Conclusion We have described an uncommon but important mode of failure of the Corail stem. Surgeons should be aware of this phenomenon; overweight patients with Dorr B‐type femurs and in whom hard bearings are used appear to be particularly at risk.

[1]  M. Bonnin,et al.  Impact of a learning curve on the survivorship of 4802 cementless total hip arthroplasties. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[2]  O Cantin,et al.  Compared fixation and survival of 280 lateralised vs 527 standard cementless stems after two years (1-7). , 2015, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[3]  G. Flivik,et al.  Design modifications of the uncemented Furlong hip stem result in minor early subsidence but do not affect further stability , 2014, Acta orthopaedica.

[4]  P. Neyret,et al.  Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  J. Vidalain Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  H. Migaud,et al.  Radiographic preoperative templating of extra-offset cemented THA implants: how reliable is it and how does it affect survival? , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[7]  W. Hozack,et al.  Introduction: Advances in surgical technology supplement. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  E. Tsiridis,et al.  Posterior longitudinal split osteotomy for femoral component extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  S. Vollset,et al.  Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  M. Froimson,et al.  Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  G. Lyritis,et al.  The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year, prospective, randomized study. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Excellent results of HA coating on a grit-blasted stem: 245 patients followed for 8-12 years , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  M A Ritter,et al.  Comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  B. Espehaug,et al.  Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  L. Dorr,et al.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. , 1993, Bone.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.