The integration of crop rotation and tillage practices in the assessment of ecosystem services provision at the regional scale

Abstract The provision of ecosystem services at the landscape level can be significantly influenced by land management practices. Within an agriculturally dominated case study area in Saxony, Germany, a more detailed land use classification, which includes differentiated information on agricultural management practices, was utilized within the raster-based planning support tool GISCAME. “Management” refers to typical, regional crop rotations and soil tillage practices. The focus of this research was based on an indicator-based approach to assess ecosystem services and the development of land use change (LUC) and land management change (LMC) scenarios. The EuroMaps Land Cover data set was specifically developed for the case study and included remote sensing information for the general land use classification and terrestrial mapping information. Furthermore, statistical data on detailed regional agricultural land management were included. The raster-based planning support tool GISCAME was then used to simulate scenarios and visualize results. The LUC and LMC scenarios showed that the more detailed land use classification provided better output for the prioritization of planning alternatives. Further it enabled a refined assessment of the provisioning services (i) food and fodder provision, (ii) biomass provision, the regulation services, (iii) soil erosion protection, (iv) drought risk regulation, (v) flood regulation, (vi) returns from land-based production (i.e. the market value of biomass provision), and (vii) ecological integrity. The results of this study support the view that the application of improved management measures, such as conservation tillage, can significantly enhance the provision of ecosystem services (e.g. soil erosion protection and drought risk regulation) at the landscape level. The study also indicates that a combination of strategic LUC, such as afforestation and LMC, might be an effective way to enhance regulating services with acceptable trade-offs regarding provisioning services. Our approach presents a refined foundation for ecosystem services assessment, which is designed to better support regional planning and the provision of information to non-experts in the participatory processes. For transfer into other regions, standardized land use and land management classification will have to be defined.

[1]  R. Harwood,et al.  Management intensity – not biodiversity – the driver of ecosystem services in a long-term row crop experiment , 2010 .

[2]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Modelling ecosystem services in terrestrial systems , 2010, F1000 biology reports.

[3]  B. Fisher,et al.  Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation , 2008 .

[4]  Rocco Scolozzi,et al.  Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. , 2012 .

[5]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models , 2004 .

[6]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  Modelling of nitrogen leaching under a complex winter wheat and red clover crop rotation in a drained agricultural field , 2009 .

[7]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis , 2006 .

[8]  A. H. Zakri,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being - Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[9]  Donna L. Mohr,et al.  Multiple Regression , 2002, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[10]  Tomoo Mizutani,et al.  National Strategy on Biological Diversity , 2000 .

[11]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[12]  Amelie Schmolke,et al.  The role of ecological models in linking ecological risk assessment to ecosystem services in agroecosystems. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  K. Wallace Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions , 2007 .

[14]  H. Haberl,et al.  Challenges for land system science , 2012 .

[15]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[16]  A. Marshall,et al.  Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  O. Bastian,et al.  Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example , 2012 .

[18]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[19]  Erwin Schmid,et al.  Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level , 2011 .

[20]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Ökologische Integrität: Risikovorsorge im nachhaltigen Landschaftsmanagement , 2001 .

[21]  Holger Meinke,et al.  Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis , 2006 .

[22]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[23]  S. Polasky,et al.  Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services , 2007 .

[24]  S. Menzel,et al.  Ecosystem Services as a Stakeholder‐Driven Concept for Conservation Science , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[25]  Godela Rossner,et al.  Mapping and indicator approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and GIS methods , 2004 .

[26]  F. Tebrügge,et al.  Reducing tillage intensity : a review of results from a long-term study in Germany , 1999 .

[27]  Martin Volk,et al.  Pimp Your Landscape: A Tool for Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Regional Planning Measures on Ecosystem Services , 2010, Environmental management.

[28]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from eastern Germany , 2008 .

[29]  N. Crossman,et al.  Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Mariusz Merta,et al.  A method for linking results from an evaluation of land use scenarios from the viewpoint of flood prevention and nature conservation , 2011 .

[31]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[32]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution , 2013 .

[33]  F. Müller,et al.  Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics , 2012 .

[34]  R. Rees,et al.  The role of crop rotations in determining soil structure and crop growth conditions , 2005 .

[35]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[36]  Frank Canters,et al.  A multiple regression approach to assess the spatial distribution of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) at the regional scale (Flanders, Belgium) , 2008 .

[37]  E. Schmid,et al.  CropRota – A crop rotation model to support integrated land use assessments , 2011 .

[38]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Valuing post-mining landscapes using an ecosystem services approach—An example from Germany , 2012 .

[39]  Robert J. A. Jones,et al.  Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990–2080 , 2005, Global change biology.

[40]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[41]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[42]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Accuracy and congruency of three different digital land-use maps , 2006 .

[43]  R. Costanza,et al.  Ecosystem services - Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences , 2010 .

[44]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Pimp Your Landscape - a Generic Approach for Integrating Regional Stakeholder Needs into Land Use Planning , 2010 .

[45]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[46]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[47]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  How to better consider sectoral planning information in regional planning: example afforestation and forest conversion , 2012 .

[48]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[49]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Characterization of the spatial distribution of farming systems in the Kenyan Highlands , 2010 .

[50]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning , 2012 .

[51]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data , 2011 .

[52]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Geographically explicit global modeling of land-use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply , 2007 .

[53]  M. Plummer,et al.  Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services , 2009 .

[54]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Regionalisation of climate change sensitive forest development types for potential afforestation areas. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[55]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change , 2008 .

[56]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics , 2012 .

[57]  G. Daily,et al.  The Ecosystem Services Framework and Natural Capital Conservation , 2008 .

[58]  F. Müller,et al.  Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Scale: the Need for Integrative Approaches , 2010 .

[59]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[60]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Carsten Lorz,et al.  Integrating land management and land-cover classes to assess impacts of land use change on ecosystem services , 2011 .