CFD simulations of two stirred tank reactors with stationary catalytic basket

Among the different systems used for laboratory kinetic investigation, stationary catalytic basket stirred tank reactors (SCBSTRs) allow one to study triphasic reactions involving shaped catalyst with large size. The hydrodynamics of these complex reactors is not well known and has been studied experimentally in only a few cases. Despite the difference in the design of two commercial SCBSTRs reported in these works, the local measurements of the liquid–solid mass transfer coefficient inside the catalytic basket revealed the same velocity profile. The aim of the present work is therefore to investigate more accurately the hydrodynamics of the two reactors by means of CFD in order to compare the effect of the blade/baffle hydrodynamic interaction on the flow pattern. Owing to the geometrical complexity of the reactors, the hydrodynamic investigation is based on the k–e model and the Brinkman–Forsheimer equations. The agreement at the local level with the experimental data (PIV and mass transfer measurements) validates this preliminary work performed with the standard values of the parameters present in the turbulent model and the Brinkman–Forsheimer equations. The simulations reveal in both reactors a ring-shaped vortex around the impeller in the agitation region. The high axial location of its centre induces a reverse flow at the tips of the basket. Owing to the fluid friction in the porous medium, the azimuthal flow in the core region is transformed into a radial flow in the basket where the flow decreases abruptly. Vertical vortices are located at the blade tips and at the downstream face of the baffles or they are located in the basket on both sides of the baffles, depending on the design and the location of the baffles. At the inner radius interface of the basket, the vertical blade impeller induces a rather homogeneous velocity profile, but the pitched blade impeller imposes a high velocity at the plane of symmetry. Therefore the simulations demonstrate that two different local velocity patterns and two different porous media may induce the same mass transfer properties.

[1]  G. Froment,et al.  Hydrocracking and isomerization of n-paraffin mixtures and a hydrotreated gasoil on Pt/ZSM-22: confirmation of pore mouth and key–lock catalysis in liquid phase , 2000 .

[2]  Ronald Adrian,et al.  PIV study of small‐scale flow structure around a Rushton turbine , 2001 .

[3]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  PARTICLE TO LIQUID MASS TRANSFER IN A ROTATING CATALYST BASKET REACTOR , 1977 .

[4]  Michael Yianneskis,et al.  Turbulence properties of the impeller stream of a Rushton turbine , 1998 .

[5]  I. F. Macdonald,et al.  Flow through Porous Media-the Ergun Equation Revisited , 1979 .

[6]  M. Germano,et al.  Turbulence: the filtering approach , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Jos Derksen,et al.  Macroinstability uncovered in a Rushton turbine stirred tank by means of LES , 2004 .

[8]  Suzanne M. Kresta,et al.  Low frequency macroinstabilities in a stirred tank: scale-up and prediction based on large eddy simulations , 2003 .

[9]  Hui Meng,et al.  Validation of CFD simulations of a stirred tank using particle image velocimetry data , 1998 .

[10]  C. Wilke,et al.  Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions , 1955 .

[11]  Johan Wärnå,et al.  Application of CFD on a Catalytic Rotating Basket Reactor , 2002 .

[12]  S. Nagata.  Mixing: Principles and Applications , 1975 .

[13]  A. Gosman,et al.  PREDICTION OF IMPELLER- INDUCED FLOW IN MIXING VESSELS USING MULTIPLE FRAMES OF REFERENCE , 1994 .

[14]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Reaction Pathways of 1-Cyclohexyloctane in Admixture with Dodecane on Pt/H–ZSM-22 Zeolite in Three-Phase Hydroconversion , 2001 .

[15]  Stefano Peratello,et al.  Experimental methods in catalytic kinetics , 1999 .

[16]  S. Goto,et al.  Liquid-solid mass transfer in basket type three-phase reactors , 1984 .

[17]  Patrick L. Mills,et al.  Multiphase catalytic reactors: a perspective on current knowledge and future trends , 2002 .

[18]  Marijana Mitrovic.  Étude des transferts de matière dans un réacteur triphasique gaz-liquide-solide, d'investigation cinétique (réacteur Robinson-Mahoney) , 2001 .

[19]  A. Paglianti,et al.  Observations on the significance of instabilities turbulence and intermittent motions on fluid mixing processes in stirred reactors , 2005 .

[20]  Elizabeth M. Marshall,et al.  Predicting the tangential velocity field in stirred tanks using the Multiple Reference Frames (MRF) model with validation by LDA measurements , 2000 .

[21]  Hui Meng,et al.  A large eddy PIV method for turbulence dissipation rate estimation , 2000 .

[22]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches , 1998 .

[23]  Alfredo Soldati,et al.  Time-dependent flow structures and Lagrangian mixing in Rushton-impeller baffled-tank reactor , 2003 .

[24]  J. Levec,et al.  Kinetics in Three-Phase Reactors , 1981 .

[25]  Paolo Orlandi,et al.  Flow in an impeller‐stirred tank using an immersed‐boundary method , 2004 .

[26]  S. Ergun.  Fluid flow through packed columns , 1952 .

[27]  P. Magnico,et al.  Hydrodynamic and transport properties of packed beds in small tube-to-sphere diameter ratio: pore scale simulation using an Eulerian and a Lagrangian approach , 2003 .

[28]  F. Turek,et al.  Effectiveness factor in a three-phase spinning basket reactor : Hydrogenation of butynediol , 1990 .

[29]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Large eddy simulations of the turbulent flow in a stirred reactor , 1998 .

[30]  G. Papadakis,et al.  Determination of mixing time and degree of homogeneity in stirred vessels with large eddy simulation , 2005 .