3D quantification of mandibular asymmetry using the SPHARM-PDM tool box

PurposePretreatment diagnosis of mandibular asymmetry in orthognathic surgery patients can be improved by quantitative shape modeling and analysis. The UNC SPHARM-PDM (University of North Carolina Spherical Harmonics—Point Distribution Model) toolbox was applied to a cohort of patients and the results were evaluated.MethodsThree-dimensional (3D) virtual surface models are constructed from CBCT scans of each patient in the cohort by segmentation. Mirroring on a sagittal arbitrary plane is used to flip the left and right sides of each image. An automatic voxel-based registration on the cranial base is used to align the volume and its mirror for comparison. SPHARM-PDM is used to compute correspondent models for each hemimandible and the mirror of the contralateral side. Procrustes analysis was used to evaluate discrepancies between each pair of models to assess asymmetry. Mandibular asymmetry was also located and quantified by computing corresponding surface distances between each hemimandible (left and right sides) and the mirror of the contralateral side.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in surrogates for mandibular asymmetry assessment based on right or the left side mirroring. Those surrogates are the rotational and translational differences between each hemimandible and the mirror of the contralateral side in 3 planes of space (the absolute values of Procrustes registration output in 6 degrees of freedom). Absolute and signed distance maps between each hemimandible and the mirror of the contralateral side located and quantified areas of asymmetry diagnosis for each patient. Even though mandibular condyle asymmetry was observed in 8% of the cases and mandibular asymmetry along areas of the ramus and mandibular corpus was noted in 17.8% of the cases, the remaining 74.2% showed generalized morphological and positional asymmetry at the condyle, the ramus and mandibular corpus.ConclusionThree-dimensional diagnosis of mandibular asymmetry revealed the complex involvement of morphological components of the mandible and the heterogeneous nature of this clinical condition. SPHARM-PDM has a promising role in the individual diagnosis and quantification of mandibular asymmetry.

[1]  J. Mühling,et al.  Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery--a review and an assessment of technology. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  Ipek Oguz,et al.  Groupwise shape correspondence with local features , 2009 .

[3]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[4]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Martin Styner,et al.  Statistical shape analysis of neuroanatomical structures based on medial models , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  Martin Styner,et al.  Framework for the Statistical Shape Analysis of Brain Structures using SPHARM-PDM. , 2006, The insight journal.

[8]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  R Kikinis,et al.  Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  Martin Styner,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  Jaime Gateno,et al.  Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.