Characteristics of a gun exchange program, and an assessment of potential benefits

Objectives—To describe a gun exchange program and assess potential benefits for participants and host communities. Methods—Mail survey of participants in a Sacramento, California gun exchange program, August 1993; the response rate was 79%. Comparative data were obtained from nationwide polls of gun owners. Results—Most (62%) respondents were men; 40% were more than 55 years old; none was less than 25. Concern that children might find and use the gun was the most frequently cited reason for participating (46% of respondents). Of 141 firearms exchanged, 72% were handguns; 23% of respondents indicated that the guns they turned in were not in working order. Of respondents who owned a gun at the time of the program (rather than those who owned no guns and turned in a gun owned by someone else), 41% owned no guns after participating; the prevalence of handgun ownership declined from 79% to 32%. Those who continued to own guns were as likely as gun owners nationwide to keep a gun loaded in the house (odds ratio (OR) 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 1.7) or to carry a gun with them (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.6 to 3.8). Conclusions—Gun exchange programs may reduce risk for firearm violence among some participants, but a number of factors limit their overall benefits to host communities.

[1]  F P Rivara,et al.  Money for guns: evaluation of the Seattle Gun Buy-Back Program. , 1994, Public health reports.

[2]  D. Dillman,et al.  Mail and telephone surveys , 1978 .

[3]  F. Rivara,et al.  Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Vernick Suicide in the home in relation to gun ownership. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  James W. Shaw,et al.  The Kansas City Gun Experiment , 1995 .

[6]  David A. Brent,et al.  The presence and accessibility of firearms in the homes of adolescent suicides : a case-control study , 1991 .

[7]  K. Kochanek,et al.  Advance Report of Final Mortality Statistics, 1994 , 1996 .

[8]  A. Piehl,et al.  Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy , 1996 .

[9]  James D. Wright,et al.  Handbook of Survey Research. , 1985 .

[10]  S. Decker,et al.  Consent to Search and Seize: Evaluating an Innovative Youth Firearm Suppression Program , 1996 .

[11]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Chapter 10 – Mail and Other Self-Administered Questionnaires1 , 1983 .

[12]  Christopher R. Hart,et al.  LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS , 1990 .

[13]  D C Grossman,et al.  The association between the purchase of a handgun and homicide or suicide. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[14]  J A Perper,et al.  The presence and accessibility of firearms in the homes of adolescent suicides. A case-control study. , 1992, JAMA.