Comparison of Social Presence in Voice-Based and Text-Based Asynchronous Computer Conferences

The significance of social presence in asynchronous computer conferencing has become an increasingly important factor in establishing high-quality online learning environments. Levels of social presence exhibited in asynchronous computer conferences influence students' perceptions of learning and satisfaction levels in Web-based courses. Recently, faculty teaching online courses have begun to use voice-based asynchronous conferencing tools with little research to support the appropriateness of the media. Deployment of voice-based technology as a pedagogical tool is delivered at a considerable cost to higher education institutions. These tools are often marketed based on the effectiveness of the technology in a learning environment. However, according to this study, there is no apparent benefit in using voice-based rather than text-based technology tools to facilitate asynchronous computer conferences in a Web-based learning environment.

[1]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[2]  E. Berscheid.  Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. 2nd ed , 1981 .

[3]  Philip Marriott.  Voice vs Text-based Discussion Forums: an implementation of Wimba Voice Boards , 2002 .

[4]  Brian L. Hawkins,et al.  EDUCAUSE Core Data Service: Fiscal Year 2005 Summary Report. , 2006 .

[5]  Deborah K. LaPointe,et al.  Speak2Me: Using Synchronous Audio for ESL Teaching in Taiwan , 2004 .

[6]  R. Mayer,et al.  Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms , 2007 .

[7]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Tracy Chao,et al.  A Case Study in Asynchronous Voice Conferencing for Language Instruction , 2003 .

[9]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[10]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Pedagogical Models for E-Learning: A Theory-Based Design Framework , 2005 .

[11]  S. Wheeler.  Creating Social Presence in Digital Learning Environments : A Presence of Mind ? , 2005 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[13]  Martha Cleveland-Innes,et al.  Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Yong Zhao,et al.  The Non-Neutrality of Technology: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study of Computer Mediated Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[15]  A. Mehrabian.  Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior , 1968 .

[16]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[17]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. , 2003 .

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style. , 2004 .

[19]  Alexandru Spatariu,et al.  Defining and Measuring Quality in Online Discussions , 2004 .

[20]  Ward Mitchell Cates,et al.  Theoretical foundations for sound's use in multimedia instruction to enhance learning , 2001 .

[21]  Mirjam Hauck,et al.  Towards an Effective Use of Audio Conferencing in Distance Language Courses , 2004 .

[22]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  C. Tu,et al.  The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes , 2002 .

[24]  T. Ellis.  Animating to Build Higher Cognitive Understanding: A Model for Studying Multimedia Effectiveness in Education * , 2004 .

[25]  Mark L. Mitchell,et al.  Research Design Explained , 1987 .