Economical green product design based on simplified computer-aided product structure variation

Environmental issues have become an imperative concern for most companies in relation to modern product development. Special procedures have to be taken during the product development process to comply with recent green directives. Product structure is recognized as a critical factor that provides effective means for reducing environmental impact in product end-of-life. However, most previous studies failed to leverage the vast latitude at the design stage due to the assumption of a fixed product structure. To overcome this deficiency, we propose a CAD-based approach that allows automatic variation of 3D product structure by means of changing the combination of parts, selecting the assembly method, and rearranging the assembly sequence. A computing scheme uses Genetic Algorithm (GA) techniques to produce an optimal product structure from the design alternatives generated by the approach. This corresponds to lower assembly/disassembly costs, while complying with specified recycling and recovering rates. The scheme also chooses a smaller set of parts that needs to be disassembled and determines an economical disassembly process. Implemented in a commercial CAD system, the test results demonstrated the effectiveness of this scheme in green product design in a cost-effective manner.

[1]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  An Analysis of the Interacting Roles of Population Size and Crossover in Genetic Algorithms , 1990, PPSN.

[2]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[3]  Tsai C. Kuo,et al.  Disassembly sequence and cost analysis for electromechanical products , 2000 .

[4]  B. González,et al.  A bill of materials-based approach for end-of-life decision making in design for the environment , 2005 .

[5]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Tsai C. Kuo,et al.  Disassembly analysis for electromechanical products: A graph-based heuristic approach , 2000 .

[7]  Michael Negnevitsky,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems , 2001 .

[8]  K Feldmann,et al.  Computer-based product structure analysis for technical goods regarding optimal end-of-life strategies , 2001 .

[9]  William Hoffman,et al.  THE "GREEN DESIGN ADVISOR": A TOOL FOR DESIGN FOR ENVIRONMENT , 1999 .

[10]  Ping Yi Chao,et al.  Analysis of assembly through product configuration , 2001 .

[11]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  Disassembly sequence plan generation using a branch-and-bound algorithm , 2001 .

[12]  Willem F. Bronsvoort,et al.  Assembly features in modeling and planning , 2000 .

[13]  Hwai-En Tseng,et al.  A replacement consideration for the end-of-life product in the green life cycle environment , 2004 .

[14]  Shana Smith,et al.  Using multiple genetic operators to reduce premature convergence in genetic assembly planning , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[15]  Kalyan Ghosh,et al.  A simplified and efficient representation for evaluation and selection of assembly sequences , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[16]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[17]  Susan Carlson Skalak.  House of Quality , 2002 .

[18]  Ajd Fred Lambert.  Exact methods in optimum disassembly sequence search for problems subject to sequence dependent costs , 2006 .

[19]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: part I , 1985 .

[20]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  Petri net approach to disassembly process planning for products with complex AND/OR precedence relationships , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems , 1999 .

[22]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost , 2000 .