The Principle of Minimal Compliance

The syntactic literature discusses a number of phenomena in which a constraint that rules out a certain class of syntactic dependencies fails to rule out structures containing both an ill-formed dependency and a well-formed dependency; well-formed dependencies seem to be able to help dependencies that would be ill formed in isolation. In this article I attempt to provide a unified account of these phenomena. I postulate a principle that allows the computational system to ignore parts of a syntactic structure that have already been checked with respect to a particular constraint.

[1]  Noam Chomsky.  Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 1964 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[4]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[5]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications , 1978 .

[6]  J. Maling.  Inversion in embedded clauses in Modern Icelandic , 1990 .

[7]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Paths and categories , 1982 .

[8]  James Mccloskey,et al.  On the syntax of person-number inflection in modern Irish , 1984, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[9]  Isabelle Haïk,et al.  The syntax of operators , 1985 .

[10]  Nathan Salmon,et al.  Reflexivity , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[11]  E. Williams.  THE ATB THEORY OF PARASITIC GAPS , 1987 .

[12]  C. Platzack.  The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter , 1987 .

[13]  C. Rudin.  On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting , 1988 .

[14]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[15]  Höskuldur Thráinsson,et al.  Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English , 1989, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Richard S. Kayne.  Facets of Romance past participle agreement , 1989 .

[17]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  On the nature of proper government , 1990 .

[18]  Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson,et al.  On Icelandic Word Order Once More , 1990 .

[19]  Nigel G. J. Richards,et al.  What Moves Where In Which Language , 1991 .

[20]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Reciprocity and plurality , 1991 .

[21]  P. Branigan,et al.  Subjects and complementizers , 1992 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[23]  A. Watanabe.  Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ , 1992 .

[24]  Kumiko Murasugi,et al.  Crossing and nested paths--NP movement in accusative and ergative languages , 1992 .

[25]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Specs for subjects: the role of TP in Icelandic , 1993 .

[26]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[27]  Gabriella Hermon,et al.  Is there LF Wh-movement? , 1994 .

[28]  D. Fox.  Economy and scope , 1995 .

[29]  Brown,et al.  Constraining XP Sequences , 1995 .

[30]  M. Brody.  Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory , 1995 .

[31]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Logical Form: From Gb to Minimalism , 1995 .

[32]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Polysynthesis Parameter , 1995 .

[33]  J. Ouhalla.  Remarks on the binding properties of wh-pronoums , 1996 .

[34]  Fleur Veraart,et al.  On the distribution of Dutch reflexives , 1996 .

[35]  Geoffrey Poole,et al.  Optional Movement in the Minimalist Program , 1996 .

[36]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian , 1997 .

[37]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[38]  SunWoo Lee.  Principles and Parameters Theory in Generative Grammar , 2000 .