Normal patterns of thoracic aortic wall shear stress measured using four-dimensional flow MRI in a large population.

Wall shear stress (WSS) plays a governing role in vascular remodeling and a pathogenic role in vessel wall diseases. However, little is known of the normal WSS patterns in the aorta as there is currently no practical means to routinely measure WSS and no normal ranges derived from population data exist. WSS measurements were made on the aorta of 224 subjects with normal anatomy using four-dimensional flow MRI with multiple encoding velocities and an optimized postprocessing routine. The spatial and temporal variation in WSS and oscillatory shear index was analyzed using a flat map representation of the unfolded aorta. The influence of aortic shape and velocity on WSS was evaluated using regression analysis. WSS in the thoracic aorta is dominated by axial flow. Average peak systolic WSS was 1.79 ± 0.71 Pa in the aortic arch and was significantly higher at 2.23 ± 1.04 Pa in the descending aorta, with a strong negative correlation with advancing age. The spatial distribution of WSS is highly heterogeneous, with a localized region of elevated WSS along the length of the anterior wall seen across all individuals. Our data demonstrate that accurate four-dimensional flow-derived WSS measurement is feasible, and we further provide a standardized parametric approach for presentation and analysis. We present a normal range for WSS across the lifespan, demonstrating a decrease in WSS with advancing age as well as illustrating the high degree of spatial and temporal variation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY With the use of four-dimensional flow MRI and postprocessing, accurate direct measurement of wall shear stress (WSS) was performed in a population of normal thoracic aortas ( n = 224). WSS was higher in the descending aorta compared with the aortic arch and decreased with age. A heterogeneous pattern of elevated WSS along the length of the aorta anterior wall was consistent across the population. This work provides normal data across the adult age range, permitting comparison with pathology.

[1]  H. Marquering,et al.  Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[3]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Three‐dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional‐MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Santanu Chandra,et al.  The Role of Geometric and Biomechanical Factors in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm: 4D flow MRI and computational fluid dynamics model , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[6]  Stuart M Grieve,et al.  Use of multi‐velocity encoding 4D flow MRI to improve quantification of flow patterns in the aorta , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Stuart M Grieve,et al.  Spatial resolution and velocity field improvement of 4D‐flow MRI , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Alastair J. Martin,et al.  Aneurysm Growth Occurs at Region of Low Wall Shear Stress: Patient-Specific Correlation of Hemodynamics and Growth in a Longitudinal Study , 2008, Stroke.

[9]  Matthias F Kriegel,et al.  Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study). , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  J. Powell,et al.  Incidence of descending aortic pathology and evaluation of the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a population-based study in England and Wales from 1999 to 2010. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[11]  J. Haga,et al.  Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  W. R. Dean LXXII. The stream-line motion of fluid in a curved pipe (Second paper) , 1928 .

[13]  W. Roberts,et al.  Aortic dissection: anatomy, consequences, and causes. , 1981, American heart journal.

[14]  David A. Steinman,et al.  An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[15]  G. Glover,et al.  Encoding strategies for three‐direction phase‐contrast MR imaging of flow , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  J. Mocco,et al.  Characterization of Critical Hemodynamics Contributing to Aneurysmal Remodeling at the Basilar Terminus in a Rabbit Model , 2010, Stroke.

[17]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Functional analysis of Fontan energy dissipation. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  A. Bolger,et al.  Passing strange: flow in the failing ventricle. , 2010, Circulation. Heart failure.

[19]  C. Weiller,et al.  Co-registration of the distribution of wall shear stress and 140 complex plaques of the aorta. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  Michael Markl,et al.  Characterization of Abnormal Wall Shear Stress Using 4D Flow MRI in Human Bicuspid Aortopathy , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  M. Loebe,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation of Chronic Aortic Dissection Hemodynamics Versus Normal Aorta , 2013, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[22]  J. Xiang,et al.  High WSS or Low WSS? Complex Interactions of Hemodynamics with Intracranial Aneurysm Initiation, Growth, and Rupture: Toward a Unifying Hypothesis , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  Petter Dyverfeldt,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  M. Langer,et al.  Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  Michael Markl,et al.  Reproducibility and interobserver variability of systolic blood flow velocity and 3D wall shear stress derived from 4D flow MRI in the healthy aorta , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  S. Sherwin,et al.  Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review , 2013, Cardiovascular research.

[28]  T. Christian Gasser,et al.  Blood flow and coherent vortices in the normal and aneurysmatic aortas: a fluid dynamical approach to intra-luminal thrombus formation , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  P. Davies,et al.  Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[30]  W. R. Dean XVI. Note on the motion of fluid in a curved pipe , 1927 .

[31]  A. Simon,et al.  Calcifications of the Thoracic Aorta on Extended Non-Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT , 2014, PloS one.