Feasibility of simultaneous PET-MR perfusion using a novel cardiac perfusion phantom

BackgroundPET-MR scanners are beginning to be employed for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. In order to examine simultaneous perfusion calculations, this work describes a feasibility study of simultaneous PET-MR of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) and PET radiotracer in a novel cardiac perfusion phantom.Results[18F]F− and GBCA were injected simultaneously into a cardiac phantom using a range of ground-truth myocardial perfusion rates of 1 to 5 ml/g/min. PET quantification of K1 (ml/g/min) was performed using a single tissue compartment model. MR perfusion was calculated using a model-independent signal deconvolution technique. PET and MR signal traces from the phantom aorta and myocardial sections show true simultaneous PET and MR arterial input functions (AIF) and myocardial uptake respectively at each perfusion rate. Calculation of perfusion parameters showed both K1 and h(t = 0) (PET and MR perfusion parameters respectively) to be linearly related with the ground truth perfusion rate (PT), and also linearly related to each other (R2 = 0.99). The highest difference in perfusion values between K1 and PT was 16% at 1 ml/g/min, and the mean difference for all other perfusion rates was <3%.ConclusionsThe perfusion phantom allows accurate and reproducible simulation of the myocardial kinetics for simultaneous PET-MR imaging, and may find use in protocol design and development of PET-MR based quantification techniques and direct comparison of quantification of the two modalities.

[1]  B. Sobel,et al.  Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[2]  R. Wilson,et al.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. , 1998, Medical physics.

[3]  S. Moore,et al.  Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  M. Jerosch-Herold Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  E. Nagel,et al.  Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[8]  B. Gerber Quantification of myocardial perfusion and myocardial perfusion reserve by positron emission tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Simultaneous Measurement of Myocardial Perfusion by Dynamic Contrast Enhancement MR and Ammonia PET , 2012 .

[10]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Voxel‐wise quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance. Feasibility and methods comparison , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  E. Nagel,et al.  Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification From MRI by Deconvolution Using an Exponential Approximation Basis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  E. Nagel,et al.  A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[15]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Modelling Parameter Role on Accuracy of Cardiac Perfusion Quantification , 2013, FIMH.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[17]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Cardiac motion compensation and resolution modeling in simultaneous PET-MR: a cardiac lesion detection study , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  P. Batchelor,et al.  Perfusion Phantom: An Efficient and Reproducible Method to Simulate Myocardial First-Pass Perfusion Measurements with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  M. Forsting,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: feasibility and initial results. , 2013, Radiology.

[20]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR Imaging of the Heart: Potential, Initial Experiences, and Future Prospects , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  B. Gersh,et al.  ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease — addenda The Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2013 .

[22]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Magnetic resonance-based motion correction for positron emission tomography imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[23]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Cardiovascular clinical applications of PET/MRI , 2013, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[24]  O. Ratib,et al.  Potential Applications of PET/MR Imaging in Cardiology , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  P. Marsden,et al.  Effect of scanner dead time on kinetic parameters determined from image derived input functions in 13N cardiac PET , 2014 .

[26]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Utility of multimodal cardiac imaging with PET/MRI in cardiac sarcoidosis: implications for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. , 2014, European heart journal.

[27]  F. Nensa,et al.  Cardiovascular Hybrid Imaging using PET/MRI , 2014, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[28]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  J. Stehli,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  E. Nagel,et al.  A quantitative high resolution assessment of myocardial blood flow from contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in a magnetic resonance compatible free beating explanted pig heart model , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[31]  Karl P. Kunze,et al.  PET/MRI of the heart. , 2015, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[32]  S. Nekolla,et al.  PET/MRI early after myocardial infarction: evaluation of viability with late gadolinium enhancement transmurality vs. 18F-FDG uptake. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[33]  P. Heusch,et al.  Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Masses: A Pilot Study , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Jinsong Ouyang,et al.  Accelerated acquisition of tagged MRI for cardiac motion correction in simultaneous PET-MR: phantom and patient studies. , 2015, Medical physics.

[35]  M. Lubberink,et al.  Quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging with integrated time-of-flight PET-MR , 2015, EJNMMI Physics.