Influence of space charge on the performance of the Kelvin probe

Measurement using a Kelvin probe depends vitally on the acquisition of a zero field between the probe and the sample. The charges in the space significantly affect the measurement of the work function change via the Kelvin probe due to the induced electric field between the probe and the sample, which adds uncertainty to the probe output. A simple model is presented in this article to depict the origin of the measurement errors. Then a solution, error deduction method, is suggested to effectively eliminate the influence due to charging by introducing a reference sample. The solution is also valid to cancel the error due to the change in the work function of the probe. The experimental results verified the feasibility of the method. Also discussed are other factors that affect the state of charging within a vacuum chamber. Careful shielding is necessary even if a stable reference sample is available. In the case where no stable reference samples are available, the use of insulating materials should be kept...

[1]  T. Terai,et al.  Work function change of first wall candidate metals due to ion beam irradiation , 2001 .

[2]  T. Terai,et al.  Study of the tritium behavior on the surface of Li2O by means of work function measurement , 2000 .

[3]  A. Suzuki,et al.  New Insight on Surface Effects of Ceramic Breeder Materials by Means of Work Function Measurement , 1998 .

[4]  A. Suzuki,et al.  Study on the surface nonstoichiometry of solid breeder blanket materials by means of work function measurement , 1998 .

[5]  A. Mills,et al.  WORK FUNCTION AND AFFINITY CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRUCTURE OF HYDROGEN-TERMINATED DIAMOND (100) SURFACES , 1998 .

[6]  M. Favre,et al.  In-situ Kelvin probe and ellipsometry study of the doping of a-Si : H and a-SiC : H layers:: Correlation with solar cell parameters , 1998 .

[7]  P. Cabarrocas,et al.  Analytical compensation of stray capacitance effect in Kelvin probe measurements , 1995 .

[8]  D. P. Woodruff,et al.  Modern techniques of surface science , 1986 .

[9]  F. Rossi.  Contact potential measurement: Spacing-dependence errors , 1992 .

[10]  F. Rossi.  Contact potential measurement: The preamplifier , 1992 .

[11]  P. J. Estrup,et al.  Noise and the Kelvin method , 1991 .

[12]  I. D. Baikie,et al.  Analysis of stray capacitance in the Kelvin method , 1991 .

[13]  S. Saito,et al.  Work Function and Dipole Barrier of Sputter-Cleaned Fe-Ni Alloy Surfaces , 1986 .

[14]  L. B. Harris,et al.  Direct determination of surface potential on sodium chloride single crystals. I. Analysis of measurements , 1985 .

[15]  S. Saito,et al.  Improvements of the piezoelectric driven Kelvin probe , 1984 .

[16]  J. Donnet,et al.  Conditions necessary to get meaningful measurements from the Kelvin method , 1982 .

[17]  K. Besocke,et al.  Piezoelectric driven Kelvin probe for contact potential difference studies , 1976 .

[18]  W. A. Zisman,et al.  A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING CONTACT POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES IN METALS , 1932 .

[19]  Lord Kelvin,et al.  V. Contact electricity of metals , 1898 .

[20]  J. Hölzl,et al.  Solid Surface Physics , 1979 .