A Lower Tidal Volume Regimen during One-lung Ventilation for Lung Resection Surgery Is Not Associated with Reduced Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Background: Protective ventilation may improve outcomes after major surgery. However, in the context of one-lung ventilation, such a strategy is incompletely defined. The authors hypothesized that a putative one-lung protective ventilation regimen would be independently associated with decreased odds of pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery. Methods: The authors merged Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database and Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group intraoperative data for lung resection procedures using one-lung ventilation across five institutions from 2012 to 2016. They defined one-lung protective ventilation as the combination of both median tidal volume 5 ml/kg or lower predicted body weight and positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O or greater. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day major postoperative pulmonary complications. Results: A total of 3,232 cases were available for analysis. Tidal volumes decreased modestly during the study period (6.7 to 6.0 ml/kg; P < 0.001), and positive end-expiratory pressure increased from 4 to 5 cm H2O (P < 0.001). Despite increasing adoption of a “protective ventilation” strategy (5.7% in 2012 vs. 17.9% in 2016), the prevalence of pulmonary complications did not change significantly (11.4 to 15.7%; P = 0.147). In a propensity score matched cohort (381 matched pairs), protective ventilation (mean tidal volume 6.4 vs. 4.4 ml/kg) was not associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.32). In an unmatched cohort, the authors were unable to define a specific alternative combination of positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume that was associated with decreased risk of pulmonary complications. Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective observational analysis of patients undergoing one-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery, the authors did not detect an independent association between a low tidal volume lung-protective ventilation regimen and a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications. This five-center retrospective observational study evaluated records from 3,232 thoracic surgical patients who underwent one-lung ventilation for pneumonectomies, bilobectomies, single lobectomies, segmentectomies, or wedge resections. Patients with tidal volumes 5 ml/kg or lower and positive end-expiratory pressure greater than 5 cm H2O did not have significantly different 30-day adverse pulmonary outcomes compared with patients not ventilated with this strategy. Higher mechanical ventilation driving pressures were not associated with composite 30-day adverse pulmonary outcome. The protective ventilation regimen tested was not associated with decreased pulmonary complications. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

[1]  Daryl A Jones,et al.  Effect of Intraoperative Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Tidal Volume on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA.

[2]  K. Tremper,et al.  Considerations for Integration of Perioperative Electronic Health Records Across Institutions for Research and Quality Improvement: The Approach Taken by the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. , 2020, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  G. Mistraletti,et al.  Body Position Alters Mechanical Power and Respiratory Mechanics During Thoracic Surgery , 2020, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  I. Song,et al.  Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, Anesthesiology.

[5]  M. Tucci,et al.  Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis , 2018, Anesthesiology.

[6]  L. Steuten,et al.  Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA.

[7]  R. Habib,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2018 Update on Research. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  O. Ljungqvist,et al.  Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  S. Jaber,et al.  Protective ventilation during anaesthesia reduces major postoperative complications after lung cancer surgery: A double-blind randomised controlled trial , 2018, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[10]  R. Malthaner,et al.  Use of lung-protective strategies during one-lung ventilation surgery: a multi-institutional survey. , 2018, Annals of translational medicine.

[11]  G. Hedenstierna,et al.  Positive End-expiratory Pressure Alone Minimizes Atelectasis Formation in Nonabdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Anesthesiology.

[12]  A. Chang,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2018 Update on Outcomes and Quality. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  S. Peiró,et al.  Individualised perioperative open-lung approach versus standard protective ventilation in abdominal surgery (iPROVE): a randomised controlled trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[14]  Andrew J. Feider,et al.  Hypoxia During One-Lung Ventilation-A Review and Update. , 2017, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[15]  S. Rees,et al.  Physiologic Evaluation of Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch and Respiratory Mechanics at Different Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Patients Undergoing Protective One-lung Ventilation , 2017, Anesthesiology.

[16]  A. Shanks,et al.  Management of 1-Lung Ventilation—Variation and Trends in Clinical Practice: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  M. Amato,et al.  Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[18]  W. Shi,et al.  Protective Lung Ventilation and Morbidity After Pulmonary Resection: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  Douglas A Colquhoun,et al.  Management of One-lung Ventilation: Impact of Tidal Volume on Complications after Thoracic Surgery , 2016, Anesthesiology.

[20]  D. Talmor,et al.  Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. , 2016, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[21]  William C. Paganelli,et al.  Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Trends and Practice Patterns: A Report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  P. Slinger,et al.  Lung Injury After One-Lung Ventilation: A Review of the Pathophysiologic Mechanisms Affecting the Ventilated and the Collapsed Lung , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  D. Talmor,et al.  Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis , 2015, Anesthesiology.

[24]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[25]  F. Donati,et al.  Step-by-step clinical management of one-lung ventilation: Continuing Professional Development , 2014, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[26]  P. Pelosi,et al.  High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[27]  M. Beaussier,et al.  A Trial of Intraoperative Low-Tidal-Volume Ventilation in Abdominal Surgery , 2014 .

[28]  M. Levin,et al.  Low intraoperative tidal volume ventilation with minimal PEEP is associated with increased mortality , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[29]  C. Wright,et al.  External validation of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  Hao Wang,et al.  The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled study. , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  M. Beaussier,et al.  A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function , 2013, Anesthesiology.

[33]  J. Blum,et al.  Preoperative and Intraoperative Predictors of Postoperative Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a General Surgical Population , 2013, Anesthesiology.

[34]  C. Yi,et al.  Does a protective ventilation strategy reduce the risk of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery?: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Chest.

[35]  F. Rapetti,et al.  Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Mechanical Power , 2019, Anesthesiology.

[36]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Comparison of two ventilatory strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. , 2010, British journal of anaesthesia.

[37]  A. Al-Jurf Positive end-expiratory pressure. , 1981, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.