How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene

The promotion of renewable energy production requires the cooperation of previously unrelated actors. In the Netherlands, a government subsidy pushes biomethane producers into a relationship with operators of the gas network. However, this cooperation proved to be very difficult. This research analyzes the problematic interaction between producers and network operators in the case of biomethane injection in the Dutch natural gas grid. We draw on the concept of ‘institutional logics’ to improve our understanding of this interaction and to identify divergent practices and belief systems. This research contributes to the multilevel perspective on socio-technical transitions, in particular to insights into the interaction between the biomethane niche and gas regime. Based on interviews and secondary data sources we find diverging logics for biomethane producers and network operators. The differences regarding the goals pursued, decision-making style, and the scale of operations hamper productive cooperation. We also observe that ‘boundary spanning’ individuals step in to increase mutual understanding and to forge productive working relationships. However, the existing logics leave very little room for maneuvering, given the embeddedness and stability of logics in thinking, acting, and physical infrastructure. Mismatching institutional logics form a serious hurdle for successful biomethane injection, and thus hinder the transition towards more renewable energy production.

[1]  L. Klerkx.  Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector , 2009 .

[2]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview , 2011 .

[3]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work , 2010 .

[4]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Business strategies of incumbents in the market for electric vehicles: opportunities and incentives for sustainable innovation , 2015 .

[6]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[7]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[9]  David H. Guston,et al.  Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.

[10]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses , 2012 .

[11]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[12]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Managing the Diffusion of Low Emission Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  B. Truffer,et al.  The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities , 2015 .

[14]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics , 2008 .

[15]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology , 2013 .

[16]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[17]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[18]  Veronica Hope Hailey,et al.  Managing Change across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices , 2005 .

[19]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[21]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[22]  Boelie Elzen,et al.  Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems , 2012 .

[23]  J. Franks.  Boundary organizations for sustainable land management: The example of Dutch Environmental Co-operatives , 2010 .

[24]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition , 2014 .

[25]  N. Thompson.  Institutional Logics and Entrepreneurship: Struggling for Legitimacy in the Emerging Bio-Energy Field , 2013 .

[26]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment , 2010 .

[27]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Implementation of manure digestion and co-combustion in the Dutch electricity regime , 2002 .

[28]  S. Moser,et al.  More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change , 2008 .

[29]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[30]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Divided We Stand: Re-Defining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice , 1990 .

[31]  James McHale,et al.  Introduction to the special section. , 2012, Family process.

[32]  Jochen Markard.  Transformation of Infrastructures: Sector Characteristics and Implications for Fundamental Change , 2011 .

[33]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory , 2014 .

[34]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[35]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective , 2007 .

[36]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[37]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries , 2008 .

[38]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[39]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[40]  Sirkku Kivisaari,et al.  System innovations in the making: hybrid actors and the challenge of up-scaling , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[42]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850-1930) , 2006 .

[43]  Andreas C. Goldthau,et al.  Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism , 2014 .

[44]  Ika Darnhofer,et al.  Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche–regime interactions? , 2013 .

[45]  Roman Kislov,et al.  BOUNDARY DISCONTINUITY IN A CONSTELLATION OF INTERCONNECTED PRACTICES , 2014 .

[46]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[47]  Eva Niesten,et al.  Recent qualitative advances on hybrid organizations: Taking stock, looking ahead , 2012 .

[48]  Roger Wilkinson,et al.  Beyond Participation: Boundary Organizations as a New Space for Farmers and Scientists to Interact , 2005 .

[49]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  UK natural gas system integration in the making, 1960–2010: Complexity, transitional uncertainties and uncertain transitions , 2014 .

[50]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes , 2003 .

[51]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[52]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[53]  W. Sine,et al.  Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry , 2003 .

[54]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies , 2015 .

[55]  A. Murphy.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2014 .

[56]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Effective public resource allocation to escape lock-in: the case of infrastructure-dependent vehicle technologies , 2012 .

[57]  Y. Yishai,et al.  Bringing Society Back in , 2001, The Societies of the Middle East and North Africa.

[58]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Co-evolution of waste and electricity regimes: Multi-regime dynamics in the Netherlands (1969-2003) , 2007 .

[59]  R. Raven,et al.  Boundary crossing innovations: Case studies from the energy domain , 2009 .

[60]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[61]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective , 2015 .

[62]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[63]  D. Sperling,et al.  Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate , 2014 .

[64]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[65]  Mike Cooley,et al.  Technological change , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[66]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Governing transitions: cases and insights from two periods in the history of the UK gas industry , 2013 .

[67]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Introduction to the special section: Infrastructures and transitions , 2010 .

[68]  Paula Kivimaa.  Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions , 2014 .

[69]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .