Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging*
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Hoffman,et al. Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[2] R. Kessler,et al. Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[3] F Shishido,et al. Measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow with H215O and dynamic positron-emission tomography. Strategy for quantification in relation to the partial-volume effect. , 1988, Circulation.
[4] M. Walsh,et al. Noninvasive quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with oxygen-15-labeled water and positron emission tomography. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] G. Hutchins,et al. A region of interest strategy for minimizing resolution distortions in quantitative myocardial PET studies. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] Jerry L Prince,et al. Measurement of Radiotracer Concentration in Brain Gray Matter Using Positron Emission Tomography: MRI-Based Correction for Partial Volume Effects , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[7] Alan C. Evans,et al. Correction for partial volume effects in PET using MRI-based 3-D simulations of individual human brain metabolism , 1993 .
[8] S C Strother,et al. The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.
[9] J C Mazziotta,et al. Methods for improving quantitation of putamen uptake constant of FDOPA in PET studies. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] W. W. Moses,et al. Empirical observation of resolution degradation in positron emission tomographs utilizing block detectors , 1994 .
[11] Evaluation of the factors affecting the accuracy and precision of a technique for quantification of volume and activity in SPECT , 1994, Nuclear medicine communications.
[12] L M Hamberg,et al. Simplified measurement of deoxyglucose utilization rate. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] J C Froment,et al. Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic Data Corrected for Cortical Atrophy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1996, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.
[14] M Schwaiger,et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] R. Myers. Quantification of brain function using PET , 1996 .
[16] Jonathan M. Links,et al. MR-Based Correction of Brain PET Measurements for Heterogeneous Gray Matter Radioactivity Distribution , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[17] M Schwaiger,et al. Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] A. Evans,et al. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[19] John S. Duncan,et al. Absolute PET Quantification with Correction for Partial Volume Effects within Cerebral Structures , 1998 .
[20] Alan C. Evans,et al. Pixel- versus Region-Based Partial Volume Correction in PET 1 1Transcripts of the BRAINPET97 discussion of this chapter can be found in Section VIII. , 1998 .
[21] U. Cremerius,et al. Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG to detect residual disease after therapy for malignant lymphoma. , 1998, Nuclear medicine communications.
[22] M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al. Quantitative functional brain imaging with positron emission tomography , 1998 .
[23] A. Gjedde,et al. Quantitative functional brain imaging with positron emission tomography , 1998 .
[24] D Strul,et al. Robustness of Anatomically Guided Pixel-by-Pixel Algorithms for Partial Volume Effect Correction in Positron Emission Tomography , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[25] Richard L. Wahl,et al. Capabilities of two- and three-dimensional FDG-PET for detecting small lesions and lymph nodes in the upper torso: a dynamic phantom study , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[26] M Schwaiger,et al. Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[27] L. Adler,et al. Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[28] S K Libutti,et al. Measuring tumor blood flow with H(2)(15)O: practical considerations. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[29] Y. Menda,et al. A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility , 2000, Nuclear medicine communications.
[30] Yasuo Kuwabara,et al. Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water and positron emission tomography: a multicentre evaluation in Japan , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[31] M. Graham,et al. Comparison of simplified quantitative analyses of FDG uptake. , 2000, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[32] S. Libutti,et al. Parametric images of blood flow in oncology PET studies using [15O]water. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[33] V. Lowe,et al. 18F-FDG labelling of human leukocytes , 2000, Nuclear medicine communications.
[34] Lilli Geworski,et al. Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[35] D. Wood,et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[36] Yuni K. Dewaraja,et al. Monte Carlo evaluation of object shape effects in iodine-131 SPET tumor activity quantification , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[37] Paul K. Marsden,et al. Effect of corrections for blood glucose and body size on [18F]FDG PET standardised uptake values in lung cancer , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[38] M. Schwaiger,et al. Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[39] I. Buvat,et al. Biases affecting the measurements of tumor-to-background activity ratio in PET , 2002 .
[40] A. Alavi,et al. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[41] Vincent Frouin,et al. Correction of partial-volume effect for PET striatal imaging: fast implementation and study of robustness. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[42] S. Libutti,et al. Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[43] Alan C. Evans,et al. Positron Emission Tomography Partial Volume Correction: Estimation and Algorithms , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[44] Robert B Livingston,et al. Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[45] R. Wahl,et al. Initial experience in small animal tumor imaging with a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanner using 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 2003, Cancer research.
[46] Irène Buvat,et al. Quantitative accuracy of dopaminergic neurotransmission imaging with (123)I SPECT. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[47] Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al. Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[48] R. Boellaard,et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[49] Stephen L Bacharach,et al. Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[50] Patrick Dupont,et al. Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET , 2004, NeuroImage.
[51] Mark Muzi,et al. 18F-FDG kinetics in locally advanced breast cancer: correlation with tumor blood flow and changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[52] F. Fazio,et al. Single-photon emission tomographic quantification in spherical objects: effects of object size and background , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[53] A. Pevsner,et al. The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[54] D. Wood,et al. Relationship between Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at Positron Emission Tomography and Surgical Stage with Relevance to Patient Prognosis , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.
[55] Jason P Fine,et al. Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[56] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[57] Eric C Frey,et al. Model-based compensation for quantitative 123I brain SPECT imaging , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.
[58] Thomas K. Lewellen,et al. Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[59] D Visvikis,et al. A multiresolution image based approach for correction of partial volume effects in emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.
[60] Joel Karp,et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[61] S. Libutti,et al. Partial-Volume Correction in PET: Validation of an Iterative Postreconstruction Method with Phantom and Patient Data , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.