Polar Localization of CheA2 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Requires Specific Che Homologs

ABSTRACT Rhodobacter sphaeroides is a motile bacterium that has multiple chemotaxis genes organized predominantly in three major operons (cheOp1, cheOp2, and cheOp3). The chemoreceptor proteins are clustered at two distinct locations, the cell poles and in one or more cytoplasmic clusters. One intriguing possibility is that the physically distinct chemoreceptor clusters are each composed of a defined subset of specific chemotaxis proteins, including the chemoreceptors themselves plus specific CheW and CheA proteins. Here we report the subcellular localization of one such protein, CheA2, under aerobic and photoheterotrophic growth conditions. CheA2 is predominantly clustered and localized at the cell poles under both growth conditions. Furthermore, its localization is dependent upon one or more genes in cheOp2 but not those of cheOp1 or cheOp3. In E. coli, the polar localization of CheA depends upon CheW. The R. sphaeroides cheOp2 contains two cheW genes. Interestingly, CheW2 is required under both aerobic and photoheterotrophic conditions, whereas CheW3 is not required under aerobic conditions but appears to play a modest role under photoheterotrophic conditions. This suggests that R. sphaeroides contains at least two distinct chemotaxis complexes, possibly composed of proteins dedicated for each subcellular location. Furthermore, the composition of these spatially distinct complexes may change under different growth conditions.

[1]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Identification and localization of a methyl‐accepting chemotaxis protein in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  Jason E. Gestwicki,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Protein Location in Bacteria andArchaea , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  J P Armitage,et al.  The roles of the multiple CheW and CheA homologues in chemotaxis and in chemoreceptor localization in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[5]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[6]  Judith P Armitage,et al.  The third chemotaxis locus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is essential for chemotaxis , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[7]  Jason E. Gestwicki,et al.  Inter-receptor communication through arrays of bacterial chemoreceptors , 2002, Nature.

[8]  J. Stock,et al.  Stimulus response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: receptor dimers in signalling arrays , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  J. Maddock,et al.  Differences in the polar clustering of the high- and low-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W R SISTROM,et al.  A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. , 1960, Journal of general microbiology.

[11]  A. Lupas,et al.  Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Molecular Information Processing: Lessons from Bacterial Chemotaxis* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  J P Armitage,et al.  Evidence for two chemosensory pathways in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: Structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J P Armitage,et al.  Fine tuning bacterial chemotaxis: analysis of Rhodobacter sphaeroides behaviour under aerobic and anaerobic conditions by mutation of the major chemotaxis operons and cheY genes , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[16]  J P Armitage,et al.  TlpC, a novel chemotaxis protein in Rhodobacter sphaeroides, localizes to a discrete region in the cytoplasm , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Rhodobacter Sphaeroides Flagellum , 1990 .

[18]  D. Bray,et al.  Modelling the bacterial chemotaxis receptor complex. , 2002, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[19]  A. Bren,et al.  How Signals Are Heard during Bacterial Chemotaxis: Protein-Protein Interactions in Sensory Signal Propagation , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  J. Stock,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis , 2003, Current Biology.

[21]  M. Simon,et al.  Attenuation of sensory receptor signaling by covalent modification. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Harley H. McAdams,et al.  Generating and Exploiting Polarity in Bacteria , 2002, Science.

[23]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[24]  J P Armitage,et al.  Localization and environmental regulation of MCP‐like proteins in Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  S. L. Porter,et al.  CheR- and CheB-Dependent Chemosensory Adaptation System of Rhodobacter sphaeroides , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.