RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions

We present a simple and effective algorithm RDOCK for refining unbound predictions generated by a rigid‐body docking algorithm ZDOCK, which has been developed earlier by our group. The main component of RDOCK is a three‐stage energy minimization scheme, followed by the evaluation of electrostatic and desolvation energies. Ionic side chains are kept neutral in the first two stages of minimization, and reverted to their full charge states in the last stage of brief minimization. Without side chain conformational search or filtering/clustering of resulting structures, RDOCK represents the simplest approach toward refining unbound docking predictions. Despite its simplicity, RDOCK makes substantial improvement upon the top predictions by ZDOCK with all three scoring functions and the improvement is observed across all three categories of test cases in a large benchmark of 49 non‐redundant unbound test cases. RDOCK makes the most powerful combination with ZDOCK2.1, which uses pairwise shape complementarity as the scoring function. Collectively, they rank a near‐native structure as the number‐one prediction for 18 test cases (37% of the benchmark), and within the top 4 predictions for 24 test cases (49% of the benchmark). To various degrees, funnel‐like energy landscapes are observed for these 24 test cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of binding funnels starting from global searches for a broad range of test cases. These results are particularly exciting, given that we have not used any biological information that is specific to individual test cases and the whole process is entirely automated. Among three categories of test cases, the best results are seen for enzyme/inhibitor, with a near‐native structure ranked as the number‐one prediction for 48% test cases, and within the top 10 predictions for 78% test cases. RDOCK is freely available to academic users at http://zlab.bu.edu/∼rong/dock. Proteins 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[2]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  A protein–protein docking benchmark , 2003, Proteins.

[3]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK predictions for the CAPRI challenge , 2003, Proteins.

[4]  Z. Weng,et al.  A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein‐protein docking , 2003, Proteins.

[5]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Protein–protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[7]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  B Honig,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein–protein interactions: Fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  S. Vajda,et al.  Protein docking along smooth association pathways , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Eleanor J. Gardiner,et al.  Protein docking using a genetic algorithm , 2001, Proteins.

[12]  L. T. Ten Eyck,et al.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[13]  S Vajda,et al.  Discrimination of near‐native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions , 2000, Proteins.

[14]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  DARWIN: A program for docking flexible molecules , 2000, Proteins.

[15]  S. Vajda,et al.  Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid‐body protein‐protein docking , 2000, Proteins.

[16]  L. Krippahl,et al.  BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions , 2000, Proteins.

[17]  D. Ritchie,et al.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations , 2000, Proteins.

[18]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Protein-Protein Docking: Generation and Filtering of Complexes , 2000 .

[19]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Examination of shape complementarity in docking of Unbound proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[20]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes , 1999, Proteins.

[21]  M. Karplus,et al.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[23]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  I. Vakser,et al.  Evaluation of GRAMM low‐resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin‐antibody complex , 1997, Proteins.

[27]  S Vajda,et al.  Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  M J Sternberg,et al.  A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  W. Pearson.  Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme–antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein docking algorithms: simulating molecular recognition , 1993 .

[33]  M J Sternberg,et al.  New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein‐protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation , 1991, Proteins.

[36]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Protein docking and complementarity. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Bruccoleri,et al.  Corrigendum: Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm , 1988, Nature.

[38]  Jiří Novotný,et al.  Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm , 1988, Nature.

[39]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[40]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[41]  K. Takano.  ON SOLUTION OF , 1983 .

[42]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  S. Wodak,et al.  Hemoglobin interaction in sickle cell fibers. I: Theoretical approaches to the molecular contacts. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.