STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION

Comparative studies tend to differ from optimality and functionality studies in how they treat adaptation. While the comparative approach focuses on the origin and change of traits, optimality studies assume that adaptations are maintained at an optimum by stabilizing selection. This paper presents a model of adaptive evolution on a macroevolutionary time scale that includes the maintenance of traits at adaptive optima by stabilizing selection as the dominant evolutionary force. Interspecific variation is treated as variation in the position of adaptive optima. The model illustrates how phylogenetic constraints not only lead to correlations between phylogenetically related species, but also to imperfect adaptations. From this model, a statistical comparative method is derived that can be used to estimate the effect of a selective factor on adaptive optima in a way that would be consistent with an optimality study of adaptation to this factor. The method is illustrated with an analysis of dental evolution in fossil horses. The use of comparative methods to study evolutionary trends is also discussed.

[1]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behaviour , 1997 .

[2]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[3]  P. Doughty.  Statistical Analysis of Natural Experiments in Evolutionary Biology: Comments on Recent Criticisms of the Use of Comparative Methods to Study Adaptation , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[4]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. Martins.  CONDUCTING PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES WHEN THE PHYLOGENY IS NOT KNOWN , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Calculating the Probability Distributions of Ancestral States Reconstructed by Parsimony on Phylogenetic Trees , 1995 .

[7]  H. Linder,et al.  CLADISTIC BIOGEOGRAPHY OF PLANTS IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW GUINEA : CONGRUENT PATTERN REVEALS TWO ENDEMIC TROPICAL TRACKS , 1995 .

[8]  V. Eigenmann,et al.  Fossil horses, systematics, paleobiology and evolution of the family equidae , 1995 .

[9]  B J Macfadden,et al.  Fossil horses, carbon isotopes and global change. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  M. Björklund.  Processes generating macroevolutionary patterns of morphological variation in birds: a simulation study , 1994 .

[11]  P. Legendre,et al.  MODELING BRAIN EVOLUTION FROM BEHAVIOR: A PERMUTATIONAL REGRESSION APPROACH , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Emília P. Martins,et al.  Estimating the Rate of Phenotypic Evolution from Comparative Data , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[13]  A. Cheetham,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF BRYOZOAN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION. II. ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND RANDOM CHANGE IN FOSSIL SPECIES USING RECONSTRUCTED GENETIC PARAMETERS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  J. Losos.  An Approach to the Analysis of Comparative Data When a Phylogeny Is Unavailable or Incomplete , 1994 .

[15]  George V. Lauder,et al.  What does the Comparative Method Reveal About Adaptation? , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[16]  H. Reeve,et al.  USING PHYLOGENIES TO TEST HYPOTHESES OF ADAPTATION: A CRITIQUE OF SOME CURRENT PROPOSALS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  M. Pagel.  Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. Maddison.  Phylogenetic Methods for Inferring the Evolutionary History and Processes of Change in Discretely Valued Characters , 1994 .

[19]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies in Comparative Analyses of Continuous Characters , 1993 .

[20]  A. Cheetham,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF BRYOZOAN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION. I. RATE TESTS FOR RANDOM CHANGE VERSUS SELECTION IN DIFFERENTIATION OF LIVING SPECIES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[22]  G. Spicer.  MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE DROSOPHILA VIRILIS SPECIES GROUP AS ASSESSED BY RATE TESTS FOR NATURAL SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  G. Lauder,et al.  Adaptations and history. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  U. Savalli.  AN APPLICATION OF THE NEUTRAL MODEL TO THE EVOLUTION OF TAIL LENGTH IN THE GENUS EUPLECTES (AVES, PLOCEIDAE) , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  P. Sherman,et al.  Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[26]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  New uses for new phylogenies , 1993, European Review.

[27]  Arthur E. Dunham,et al.  Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: the use of phylogenetic comparative analyses , 1993 .

[28]  G. Williams,et al.  Natural selection : domains, levels, and challenges. , 1994 .

[29]  E. Martins.  The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Paul H. Harvey, Mark D. Pagel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991), vii, + 239 Price $24.95 paperback , 1992 .

[30]  A. Grafen.  The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression , 1992 .

[31]  M. Pagel.  A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[32]  D. Houle.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. , 1992, Genetics.

[33]  M. Lynch.  METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  T. Garland,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Mark Ridley,et al.  Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: A research program in comparative biology , 1991 .

[36]  D. Baum,et al.  ADAPTATION REVIEWED: A PHYLOGENETIC METHODOLOGY FOR STUDYING CHARACTER MACROEVOLUTION , 1991 .

[37]  CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES: A REPLY TO CODDINGTON , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[38]  BRIDGES BETWEEN EVOLUTIONARY PATTERN AND PROCESS , 1990 .

[39]  M. Lynch.  The Rate of Morphological Evolution in Mammals from the Standpoint of the Neutral Expectation , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimality theory in evolutionary biology , 1990, Nature.

[41]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .

[42]  T. Valone,et al.  The Optimization Research Program: Studying Adaptations by Their Function , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[43]  A. Grafen.  The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[44]  M. Ridley.  Why not to use species in comparative tests , 1989 .

[45]  B. MacFadden,et al.  Explosive speciation at the base of the adaptive radiation of Miocene grazing horses , 1988, Nature.

[46]  B. MacFadden.  Fossil horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus, 2: rates of dental evolution revisited , 1988 .

[47]  M. Fortelius,et al.  ON THE MEANS WHEREBY MAMMALS ACHIEVE INCREASED FUNCTIONAL DURABILITY OF THEIR DENTITIONS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LIMITING FACTORS , 1988, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[48]  M. Lynch,et al.  The rate of polygenic mutation. , 1988, Genetical research.

[49]  J. Coddington.  CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[50]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[51]  B. MacFadden.  Fossil horses from “Eohippus” (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope's Law, and the evolution of body size , 1986, Paleobiology.

[52]  J. Cheverud,et al.  THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS IN COMPARATIVE ANALYSES: SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BODY WEIGHT AMONG PRIMATES , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  Bruce J. MacFadden,et al.  Patterns of phylogeny and rates of evolution in fossil horses: hipparions from the Miocene and Pliocene of North America , 1985, Paleobiology.

[54]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[55]  M. Fortelius.  Ungulate cheek teeth : developmental, functional, and evolutionary interrelations , 1985 .

[56]  Paul H. Harvey.  The Explanation of Organic Diversity: the Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating, Mark Ridley. Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983), viii, +272. Price £19.00 , 1984 .

[57]  L. Radinsky,et al.  ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY IN HORSE SKULL EVOLUTION , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  S. Stearns.  The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals , 1983 .

[59]  C. Moreno,et al.  The role of grazers in the zonation of intertidal macroalgae of the Chilean coast , 1983 .

[60]  C. Gardiner.  Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[61]  Stephen C. Steams.  The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in the mammals , 1983 .

[62]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[63]  R. Lande.  QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  R. Lande.  NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  Major Features Of Evolution , 1954 .

[66]  G. Simpson.  Horses: The Story of the Horse Family in the Modern World and Through Sixty Million Years of History. , 1951 .

[67]  G. Simpson.  Tempo and mode in evolution. , 1946, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[68]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[69]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.