Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom

The research reported in this study focuses on an investigation into the teaching of argumentation in secondary science classrooms. Over a 1‐year period, a group of 12 teachers from schools in the greater London area attended a series of workshops to develop materials and strategies to support the teaching of argumentation in scientific contexts. Data were collected at the beginning and end of the year by audio‐recording and video‐recording lessons where the teachers attempted to implement argumentation. To assess the quality of argumentation, analytical tools derived from Toulmin’s argument pattern were developed and applied to classroom transcripts. Teachers’ use of argumentation developed across the year, the pattern of use was teacher‐specific, as was the nature of change. To inform future professional development programmes, transcripts of five teachers, three showing a significant change and two showing no change, were analysed in more detail to identify features of teachers’ oral contributions that facilitated and supported argumentation. All teachers attempted to encourage a variety of processes involved in argumentation; teachers whose lessons included the highest quality of argumentation (Toulmin’s argument pattern analysis) also encouraged higher‐order processes in their teaching. The analysis of teachers’ facilitation of argumentation has helped to guide the development of in‐service materials and to identify the barriers to learning in the professional development of less experienced teachers.

[1]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[2]  B. Joyce,et al.  Student Achievement Through Staff Development , 1988 .

[3]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  The Role of Refutation Text in Overcoming Difficulty with Science Concepts. College Reading and Learning Assistance Technical Report 85-08. , 1985 .

[4]  Hugh Munby,et al.  School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge , 2000 .

[5]  Stanley Pogrow.  Reforming the Wannabe Reformers: Why Education Reforms Almost Always End Up Making Things Worse. , 1996 .

[6]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[7]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argument in school science , 2001 .

[8]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science , 1999 .

[9]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[10]  E. Fischer,et al.  Thinking About Science , 1988 .

[11]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[12]  Stanley B. Straw,et al.  The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study , 2000 .

[13]  Christine Chin.  Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking , 2006 .

[14]  D. Schon.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. , 1987 .

[15]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[16]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[17]  Beverley Bell,et al.  Students' Thinking and the Learning of Science: A Constructivist View. , 1986 .

[18]  P. Black,et al.  Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom , 2004 .

[19]  Patrick Fullick.  Investigations by Order: Policy, curriculum and science teachers' work under the Education Reform Act , 1997 .

[20]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge Activation Modes and Text Structure on Nonscience Majors’ Comprehension of Physics , 1989 .

[21]  Students' questions: fostering a culture of inquisitiveness in science classrooms , 2004 .

[22]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al.  Argument in High School Genetics. , 1997 .

[23]  C. Sutton,et al.  Words, Science and Learning , 1992 .

[24]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[25]  G. Wells,et al.  Dialogue in the Classroom , 2006 .

[26]  Franz Rauch,et al.  Teacher learning for educational change , 2004 .

[27]  S. Erduran,et al.  LEARNING TO TEACH ARGUMENTATION: CASE STUDIES OF PRE-SERVICE , 2006 .

[28]  Instruction,et al.  Learning and Instruction : European Research in an International Context / , 1991 .

[29]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[30]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Science Education for the Future. , 1998 .

[31]  Tom Russell.  Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: Can teachers' questions distort scientific authority? , 1983 .

[32]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance , 1997 .

[33]  Patricia E. Blosser.  How to ask the right questions , 1991 .

[34]  J. Wallace,et al.  Leadership and professional development in science education : new possibilities for enhancing teacher learning , 2003 .

[35]  Helena Caldeira,et al.  An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena , 2000 .

[36]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science , 2001 .

[37]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[38]  Türk Fen,et al.  Effective Teaching in Science: A Review of Literature , 2007 .

[39]  Brian Hand,et al.  Comparing an Inquiry‐based Approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic to Traditional Science Teaching Practices: Are there differences? , 2007 .

[40]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[41]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Ideas, Evidence and Argument in Science , 2004 .

[42]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[43]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[44]  Jon Ogborn.  Ownership and transformation: teachers using curriculum innovations , 2002 .

[45]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[46]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Teaching for Understanding: Three Key Attributes. , 1989 .

[47]  P. Scott.  Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review , 1998 .

[48]  Rebecca A. Krystyniak,et al.  Analysis of Verbal Interactions during an Extended, Open-Inquiry General Chemistry Laboratory Investigation. , 2007 .

[49]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[50]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[51]  Robert E. Reys,et al.  The Top 10 Elements That Must Be in Place To Implement Standards-Based Mathematics Curricula. , 1999 .

[52]  David H. Palmer.  A Motivational View of Constructivist‐informed Teaching , 2005 .

[53]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Students’ reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis , 1998 .

[54]  Rosanne Steinbach,et al.  Changing leadership for changing times , 1999 .

[55]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[56]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  Changing teachers' practice: curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA , 2002 .

[57]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Encouraging and Analyzing Student Questions in a Large Physics Course: Meaningful Patterns for Instructors , 2003 .

[58]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  The Use of Questions in Teaching , 1970 .

[59]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .

[60]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[61]  James P. Spillane.  External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment , 1999 .

[62]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Systemic teacher development to enhance the use of argumentation in school science activities , 2003 .

[63]  Lisa Frankes,et al.  Teachers and Teaching: From Classroom to Reflection , 1993 .

[64]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .