2 How Material Culture Acted on the Ancient Maya of Yucatan, Mexico

This paper looks at how materiality in a specific sense (e.g., aspects of raw materials) contributes to materiality in a broader sense (e.g., the mutually constitutive relations between people and things). We embark from the point that common materials, such as stone and perishable containers (baskets, gourds), shape people's social interactions and their physical sensibilities. The use of very large stones for buildings in and around Uci, a local political center in the northern Maya Lowlands of Yucatan, Mexico, required people to draw on a large web of social relations in order to get access to the right stone and the right labor. Furthermore, hauling such stones and placing them in walls required a very literal form of physical dialogue between laborers that is otherwise quite rare, akin to carrying a couch. We believe that the closely coordinated and intimately shared physical maneuvers required to haul and place a 150 kg stone intensified the bonds between co-actors, who were likely part of the same household. This suggests that the stability of households depends not just on what people do, but how they do these things together. Many households at two sites near Uci—Kancab and 21 de Abril—depended heavily on baskets and gourds since pottery was scarce. Aspects of the making of these tools, such as the procurement of materials for baskets, sent people beyond their homes and into contact with many others. Thus, we argue that discussions of materials in craftwork should expand to consider the social entanglements entailed in the procurement of materials. Furthermore, we argue that the specific tactile characteristics of perishable goods such as baskets and gourds help create different kinds of people. In households with less pottery, day to day use of baskets and gourds would have inculcated non-discursive senses of touch that rose to discursive consciousness at community wide occasions at households that served meals on pottery. Such events would have been diacritical, making participants aware of the differences between themselves. In sum, raw materials such as stone and gourds play a large role in making actors who they were and creating social networks.

[1]  Christopher D. Dore,et al.  Interpreting prehistoric settlement patterns : lessons from the Maya center of Sayil, Yucatan , 1995 .

[2]  T. Stanton,et al.  Assessing the Role of Preclassic Traditions in the Formation of Early Classic Yucatec Cultures, México , 2010 .

[3]  Harriet F. Beaubien From Codex to Calabash: Recovery of a Painted Organic Artifact from the Archaeological Site of Cerén, El Salvador , 1993 .

[4]  T. Ingold Materials against materiality , 2007, Archaeological Dialogues.

[5]  F. Gerritsen To build and to abandon , 1999, Archaeological Dialogues.

[6]  W. A. Haviland Maya settlement patterns : a critical review , 1966 .

[7]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Pragmatogonies: A Mythical Account of How Humans and Nonhumans Swap Properties , 1994 .

[8]  T. Ingold The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[9]  Christopher A. Pool,et al.  A Ceramic Perspective on the Formative to Classic Transition in Southern Veracruz, Mexico , 2000, Latin American Antiquity.

[10]  M. Deal Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation , 1985 .

[11]  Harriet F. Beaubien From Codex to Calabash: Recovery of a Painted Organic Artifact from the Archaeological Site of Cerén, El Salvador@@@From Codex to Calabash: Recovery of a Painted Organic Artifact from the Archaeological Site of Ceren, El Salvador , 1993 .

[12]  Ian Hodder,et al.  Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective , 2011 .

[13]  R. Joyce,et al.  WORKING WITH CLAY , 2014, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[14]  Bjørnar Olsen,et al.  Material culture after text: re‐membering things , 2003 .

[15]  Scott R. Hutson,et al.  Beyond the buildings: Formation processes of ancient Maya houselots and methods for the study of non-architectural space , 2007 .

[16]  R. Fry SOCIAL DIMENSIONS IN CERAMIC ANALYSIS: A case study from peripheral Tikal , 2003, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[17]  M. Owoc From the Ground Up: Agency, Practice, and Community in the Southwestern British Bronze Age , 2005 .

[18]  W. A. Haviland Occupational Specialization at Tikal, Guatemala: Stoneworking-Monument Carving , 1974, American Antiquity.

[19]  Susan M. Alt,et al.  Agency in a Postmold? Physicality and the Archaeology of Culture-Making , 2005 .

[20]  J. Sabloff,et al.  People Who Lived in Stone Houses: Local Knowledge and Social Difference in the Classic Maya Puuc Region of Yucatan, Mexico , 2011, Latin American Antiquity.

[21]  Simon Martin,et al.  Daily life of the ancient Maya recorded on murals at Calakmul, Mexico , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  S. Houston,et al.  The Ancient Maya Self: Personhood and Portraiture in the Classic Period , 1998, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.