Steady states and sensitivities of commonly used pelagic ecosystem model components

Pelagic, coupled ocean circulation-ecosystem models, are widely used in climate research. These tools aim to quantify fluxes of nutrients and carbon in the ocean and are, increasingly, the base of future projections. For this purpose it is crucial to quantify and identify the sources of uncertainties. In contrast to physical models, the underlying equations for ecosystem models are derived from empirical relationships rather than based on first principles. This resulted in the development of a multitude of different ecosystem models – different in respect to both, underlying principles and complexity. Clearly, the question arises, to what extent the sensitivities of these models are comparable. This study focuses on the intrinsic dynamics of some widely used, simple (containing 2–3 prognostic variables) ecosystem models in a 0-D framework (i.e., comprising only the well-mixed oceanic surface layer). A suite of differing model approaches is tuned such that their behavior is similar. The setup resembles the well-mixed oceanic surface layer in the Baltic proper. It is illustrated that strong differences between the model approaches appear due to exemplary, anticipated changes in the external nutrient and light conditions. Herewith, we demonstrate the well-known, but rarely demonstrated fact that, apparent consistency between modeled prognostic variables with today's data bases is not necessarily a good measure of forecast skill. The causes which lead to the different sensitivities are illustrated by considering the steady state solutions. It is pointed out, that apparently small changes in the model formulations can result in very different dynamical behavior and an enormous spread between the model approaches, despite the feasibility to tune a common behavior in a limited range of light and nutrient supply. In our examples, the sensitivity is mainly a function of the formulation of the loss rate of phytoplankton. It is thus, in particular, the formulation of highly unknown heteorotrophic processes that determines the model sensitivity.

[1]  Lakshmi Kantha,et al.  A general ecosystem model for applications to primary productivity and carbon cycle studies in the global oceans , 2004 .

[2]  Steven J. Bograd,et al.  Nutrient and salinity decadal variations in the central and eastern North Pacific , 2009 .

[3]  N. Rabalais,et al.  Simulated responses of the Gulf of Mexico hypoxia to variations in climate and anthropogenic nutrient loading , 2003 .

[4]  B. Hodges,et al.  Simple models of steady deep maxima in chlorophyll and biomass , 2004 .

[5]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models : Role of multiple planktonic groups , 2007 .

[6]  Dennis A. Hansell,et al.  Biogeochemistry of marine dissolved organic matter , 2002 .

[7]  K. Denman,et al.  The response of two coupled one-dimensional mixed layer/planktonic ecosystem models to climate change in the NE subarctic Pacific Ocean , 2002 .

[8]  Katja Fennel,et al.  Subsurface maxima of phytoplankton and chlorophyll: Steady‐state solutions from a simple model , 2003 .

[9]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models , 2010 .

[10]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Adiabatic reduction of circulation‐related CO2 air‐sea flux biases in a North Atlantic carbon‐cycle model , 2006 .

[11]  J. Toggweiler,et al.  A seasonal three‐dimensional ecosystem model of nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic Euphotic Zone , 1993 .

[12]  Peter S. Liss,et al.  The sea surface and global change , 1997 .

[13]  A. Oschlies,et al.  An eddy‐permitting coupled physical‐biological model of the North Atlantic: 1. Sensitivity to advection numerics and mixed layer physics , 1999 .

[14]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Ecosystem behavior at Bermuda Station “S” and ocean weather station “India”: A general circulation model and observational analysis , 1993 .

[15]  N. Blough The Sea Surface and Global Change: Photochemistry in the sea-surface microlayer , 1997 .

[16]  J. Steele,et al.  The role of predation in plankton models , 1992 .

[17]  de Henricus Baar,et al.  von Liebig's law of the minimum and plankton ecology (1899–1991) , 1994 .

[18]  Stéphane Blain,et al.  An ecosystem model of the global ocean including Fe, Si, P colimitations , 2003 .

[19]  T. Neumann Climate-change effects on the Baltic Sea ecosystem: A model study , 2010 .

[20]  Andreas Oschlies,et al.  Simultaneous data-based optimization of a 1D-ecosystem model at three locations in the North Atlantic: Part I— Method and parameter estimates , 2003 .

[21]  G. Broström On advection and diffusion of plankton in coarse resolution ocean models , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  Plankton functional type modelling : running before we can walk? , 2005 .

[23]  J. Andersen,et al.  Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea – An integrated thematic assessment of the effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication in the Baltic Sea region. , 2009 .

[24]  S. Doney,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics and stability properties of size-structured pelagic ecosystem models , 2002 .

[25]  A. Schmittner Decline of the marine ecosystem caused by a reduction in the Atlantic overturning circulation , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Peter Franks,et al.  NPZ Models of Plankton Dynamics: Their Construction, Coupling to Physics, and Application , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas Neumann,et al.  Towards a 3D-ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea , 2000 .

[28]  Thomas M. Powell,et al.  Results from a three-dimensional, nested biological-physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery , 2006 .

[29]  Kevin J. Flynn,et al.  Castles built on sand : dysfunctionality in plankton models and the inadequacy of dialogue between biologists and modellers , 2005 .

[30]  A. Stigebrandt,et al.  NUTRIENT DYNAMICS OF THE BALTIC SEA , 1990 .

[31]  David M. Karl,et al.  Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum , 2006, Nature.

[32]  N. Blough,et al.  Chapter 10 – Chromophoric DOM in the Coastal Environment , 2002 .

[33]  K. Myrberg,et al.  Physical Oceanography of the Baltic Sea , 2009 .

[34]  J. Allen,et al.  Ecosystem response to upwelling off the Oregon coast: Behavior of three nitrogen‐based models , 2003 .

[35]  B. Jansson,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE BALTIC SEA IN THE 1940S, TODAY, AND IN THEFUTURE , 1999 .

[36]  B. Håkansson,et al.  Long‐term trends in Secchi depth in the Baltic Sea , 1996 .

[37]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Baltic Sea environment proceedings , 1991 .

[38]  E. Galbraith,et al.  Glacial greenhouse-gas fluctuations controlled by ocean circulation changes , 2008, Nature.

[39]  Morten D. Skogen,et al.  North Sea sensitivity to atmospheric forcing , 2011 .

[40]  Richard J. Matear,et al.  Parameter optimization and analysis of ecosystem models using simulated annealing: a case study at Station P , 1995 .

[41]  Role of wind stress and heat fluxes in interannual-to-decadal variability of air-sea CO2 and O2 fluxes in the North Atlantic , 2006 .

[42]  W. Kemp,et al.  Nutrient enrichment, habitat variability and trophic transfer efficiency in simple models of pelagic ecosystems , 2001 .

[43]  S. Seitzinger,et al.  EUTROPHICATION OF SWEDISH SEAS , 2006 .

[44]  Glenn R. Flierl,et al.  Behavior of a simple plankton model with food-level acclimation by herbivores , 1986 .

[45]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  The high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll regime of the ocean: limits on biomass and nitrate before and after iron enrichment , 2004 .

[46]  N. Bond,et al.  Climate projections for selected large marine ecosystems , 2010 .

[47]  M. Moran,et al.  Role of photoreactions in the formation of biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter , 1997 .

[48]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Zooplankton mortality and the dynamical behaviour of plankton population models , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[49]  Roger Proctor,et al.  Predicting the consequences of nutrient reduction on the eutrophication status of the North Sea , 2010 .