Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment.

The issue of how the Euclidean properties of space are represented in the nervous system is a main focus in the study of visual perception, but is equally relevant to motor learning. The goal of our experiments was to investigate how the properties of space guide the remapping of motor coordination. Subjects wore an instrumented data glove that recorded the finger motions. Signals generated by the glove operated a remotely controlled endpoint: a cursor on a computer monitor. The subjects were instructed to execute movements of this endpoint with controlled motions of the fingers. This required inverting a highly redundant map from fingers to cursor motions. We found that 1) after training with visual feedback of the final error (but not of the ongoing cursor motion), subjects learned to map cursor locations into configurations of the fingers; 2) extended practice of movement led to more rectilinear cursor movement, a trend facilitated by training under continuous visual feedback of cursor motions; 3) with practice, subjects reduced motion in the degrees of freedom that did not contribute to the movements of the cursor; 4) with practice, subjects reduced variability of both cursor and hand movements; and 5) the reduction of errors and the increase in linearity generalized beyond the set of movements used for training. These findings suggest that subjects not only learned to produce novel coordinated movement to control the placement of the cursor, but they also developed a representation of the Euclidean space on which hand movements were remapped.

[1]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion manifolds , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  S. A. Stoeter,et al.  Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , 2003 .

[6]  John Baillieul,et al.  Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  R. Shepard Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[9]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[10]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Integrable Solutions of Kinematic Redundancy via Impedance Control , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  J. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Charles W. Wampler,et al.  On the Inverse Kinematics of Redundant Manipulators , 1988, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  J. Hadamard Sur les problemes aux derive espartielles et leur signification physique , 1902 .

[14]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[16]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Gary Hatfield,et al.  Representation and constraints: the inverse problem and the structure of visual space. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[19]  M. Schieber Individuated finger movements of rhesus monkeys: a means of quantifying the independence of the digits. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  M T Turvey,et al.  Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[23]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual pathways to perception and action. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[28]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Meagher Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[31]  Adi Ben-Israel,et al.  Generalized inverses: theory and applications , 1974 .

[32]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  A. Bahill,et al.  Determining ideal baseball bat weights using muscle force-velocity relationships , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  R. K. Simpson Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[35]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[36]  T. Shamir,et al.  Repeatability of redundant manipulators: mathematical solution of the problem , 1988 .

[37]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[38]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[39]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Goodale,et al.  Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action , 1993 .

[41]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Human finger independence: limitations due to passive mechanical coupling versus active neuromuscular control. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[43]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Biological constraints simplify the recognition of hand shapes , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  P. Viviani,et al.  32 Space-Time Invariance in Learned Motor Skills , 1980 .