Improving Quality in a Cytopathology Laboratory

Quality assurance in a cytopathology laboratory is achieved by involving all the parties that contributes to cytopathology procedures. Quality assurance measures start with the laboratory directors to the cytopathotechnologists at work. High-quality results are achieved when all the parties work together by following the Standard operation procedures failure to which quality is undermined. Laboratory directors in a cytopathology laboratory are responsible for risk analysis and management. Proper risk analysis techniques help the lab manager to identify the weak points among the technologists. Proper management involves giving out good guidelines or instructions on what should be done to solve the problems that have been identified. There is the need to accredit and comply with the international accepted policies and procedures and excellent documentation to help deal with malpractices. Modern health care has faced a revolution due to a variety of factors, some of which are- newest techniques in laboratory medicine, trained staff operating diagnostic medical laboratories and ultra-modern analytical equipment. A Quality Management System (QMS) has been suggested by the ISO 15189 International Standard, which if followed, can help sustain and improve the testing services offered by diagnostic laboratories, such as cytopathology laboratories. Cytopathology laboratories should only employ laboratory technologists have undergone through the recommended training and have licenses from the regulatory bodies. The staff members of cytopathology laboratory should follow the standard operating procedures. SOPs help in coming up with high-quality results.

[1]  N. Joste,et al.  The modern cytology laboratory: moving beyond the Pap test. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[2]  M. Mino‐Kenudson,et al.  Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines , 2014, CytoJournal.

[3]  M. Stamouli,et al.  Improvement of Clinical Laboratory Services through Quality , 2013 .

[4]  Paul R Eden,et al.  Quality control in clinical laboratory samples. , 2015, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[5]  A. Liberis,et al.  Quality Control and Assurance in ISO15189:2012 Molecular Cytopathology Laboratories for HPV DNA Testing , 2019, Acta Scientific Microbiology.

[6]  A. Fassina,et al.  The UEMS Section/Board of Pathology, Chapter 6: Requirement for Recognition of Postgraduate Training in Pathology: a presentation of the Paris Document , 2012, Cytopathology.

[7]  K. Kapila,et al.  Training and practice of cytotechnologists: a discussion forum focused on Europe , 2014, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[8]  K. Khurana,et al.  Telecytology and its evolving role in cytopathology , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[9]  R. Nayar,et al.  2013 Statement on Human Papillomavirus DNA Test Utilization. , 2014, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.

[10]  Darren C. Ames,et al.  External quality assessment: best practice , 2014, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[11]  Rhona J. Souers,et al.  Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4. , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  L. Smart,et al.  BAC recommended code of practice for cytology laboratories participating in the UK cervical screening programmes 2015: a secondary publication , 2016, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[13]  Elizabeth Weirich,et al.  Guidelines for safe work practices in human and animal medical diagnostic laboratories. Recommendations of a CDC-convened, Biosafety Blue Ribbon Panel. , 2012, MMWR supplements.

[14]  Alan Wells,et al.  Workflow organization in pathology. , 2012, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[15]  A. Longatto-Filho,et al.  Recommendations on Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Cervical Cytology , 2015, Acta Cytologica.

[16]  Stavros K Archondakis,et al.  ISO 15189: 2012 Technical Requirements for Cytopathology Laboratory Information Systems , 2014 .

[17]  Naveena Singh,et al.  Cytopathology: An Introduction , 2012 .

[18]  G. Stuart,et al.  Cytopathology , 2012, Definitions.

[19]  A. Wilson The role of Cytotechnologists in quality assurance and audit in non‐gynaecological cytology , 2015, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[20]  T. Peter,et al.  Impact of mentorship on WHO-AFRO Strengthening Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) , 2011, African journal of laboratory medicine.

[21]  A. Renshaw,et al.  American society of cytopathology workload recommendations for automated pap test screening: Developed by the productivity and quality assurance in the era of automated screening task force , 2013, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[22]  Stavros K Archondakis,et al.  The Use of Mobile Health Applications for Quality Control and Accreditational Purposes in a Cytopathology Laboratory , 2016 .

[23]  P. VanderLaan,et al.  Measuring and assuring quality performance in cytology: A toolkit , 2017, Cancer cytopathology.

[24]  C. Bergeron,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of p16(INK4a) cytology vs HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical disease in the triage of ASC-US and LSIL pap cytology results. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[25]  D. Allen Histopathology Reporting: Guidelines for Surgical Cancer , 2020 .

[26]  J. Tworek,et al.  The role of monitoring interpretive rates, concordance between cytotechnologist and pathologist interpretations before sign-out, and turnaround time in gynecologic cytology quality assurance: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference wo , 2013, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[27]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Practical Informatics for Cytopathology , 2014 .

[28]  Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara,et al.  External Quality Control of Cervical Cytopathology: Interlaboratory Variability , 2013, Acta Cytologica.

[29]  M. Mino‐Kenudson,et al.  Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines , 2014, Diagnostic cytopathology.