Behavioral intermittence, Lévy patterns, and randomness in animal movement

The recent debate on both the existence and the cause of fractal (Levy) patterns in animal movement resonates with much deeper and richer problems in movement ecology: (1) establishing mechanistic links between animal behavior and statistical patterns of movement, and (2) understanding what is the role of randomness (stochasticity) in animal motion. Here, the idea of behavioral intermittence is shown to be crucial to establish mechanistic connections between the behavior of organisms and the statistical properties they generate when moving. Attention is drawn to the fact that some random walk modeling procedures can impair the identification of intermittent biological mechanisms which could govern major statistical properties of movement. This fact, together with some misconceptions and prejudices regarding the role of randomness in animal motion may explain why stochastic processes have been disregarded as a potential source of adaptation in animal movement. In the near future, the advances in biotelemetry together with a more explicit consideration of behavioral intermittence, and the development of novel random walk approaches, could help us to set up the bases for a landscape-level behavioral ecology.

[1]  W. G. SPENCE PATERSON The New Volcanic Island off Iceland , 1884, Nature.

[2]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  On the Methods of Resource Division in Grassland Bird Communities , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[3]  I. Good,et al.  Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension , 1978 .

[4]  P. L. Miller,et al.  A possible sensory function for the stop—go patterns of running in phorid flies , 1979 .

[5]  明 大久保,et al.  Diffusion and ecological problems : mathematical models , 1980 .

[6]  M. Pienkowski,et al.  Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  THE SEARCH FOR RESOURCES BY CABBAGE BUTTERFLIES (PIERIS RAPAE): ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES AND ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF MARKOVIAN MOVEMENTS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT' , 1984 .

[8]  S. Benhamou,et al.  Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model* , 1988 .

[9]  G Sugihara,et al.  Applications of fractals in ecology. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  N. Ricci The behaviour of ciliated protozoa , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Quantifying insect movement in the field , 1991 .

[12]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers , 1991 .

[13]  M K Tourtellot,et al.  The problem of movelength and turn definition in analysis of orientation data. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Self-organized fractal river networks. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[15]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[16]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Fractal Analyses of Animal Movement: A Critique , 1996 .

[17]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[19]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality , 1997 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[21]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[22]  H. Stanley,et al.  Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.

[23]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Chance in Biology: Using Probability to Explore Nature , 2000 .

[24]  Jean-René Martin,et al.  The Power Law Distribution for Walking-Time Intervals Correlates with the Ellipsoid-Body in Drosophila , 2001, Journal of neurogenetics.

[25]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion1 , 2001 .

[26]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion , 2001 .

[27]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[28]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  SCALING UP ANIMAL MOVEMENTS IN HETEROGENEOUS LANDSCAPES: THE IMPORTANCE OF BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[29]  F. Bartumeus,et al.  Helical Lévy walks: Adjusting searching statistics to resource availability in microzooplankton , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Vilar,et al.  From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium , 2004, Nature.

[31]  J. Klafter,et al.  The restaurant at the end of the random walk: recent developments in the description of anomalous transport by fractional dynamics , 2004 .

[32]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk , 1983, Oecologia.

[33]  Patrick J Butler,et al.  Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Fractals and search paths in mammals , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[36]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  HABITAT-SPECIFIC MOVEMENT PARAMETERS ESTIMATED USING MARK–RECAPTURE DATA AND A DIFFUSION MODEL , 2004 .

[37]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[38]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  ANIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES: A QUANTITATIVE RANDOM‐WALK ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[40]  M. Úriz,et al.  The dynamics of sponge larvae assemblages from northwestern Mediterranean nearshore bottoms , 2005 .

[41]  Germinal Cocho,et al.  Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Andy M. Reynolds On the intermittent behaviour of foraging animals , 2006 .

[43]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Conservation physiology. , 2020, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Mathieu Coppey,et al.  Intermittent search strategies: When losing time becomes efficient , 2006 .

[45]  M. Maldonado The ecology of the sponge larva , 2006 .

[46]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources , 2007 .

[47]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Free-Flight Odor Tracking in Drosophila Is Consistent with an Optimal Intermittent Scale-Free Search , 2007, PloS one.

[48]  B. Brembs,et al.  Order in Spontaneous Behavior , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  D. Sims,et al.  Minimizing errors in identifying Lévy flight behaviour of organisms. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[50]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[51]  John Travis,et al.  Do Wandering Albatrosses Care About Math? , 2007, Science.

[52]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  LÉVY PROCESSES IN ANIMAL MOVEMENT: AN EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS , 2007 .

[53]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[54]  R. Menzel,et al.  Displaced honey bees perform optimal scale-free search flights. , 2007, Ecology.

[55]  B. Enquist,et al.  On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions. , 2008, Ecology.

[56]  G. Viswanathan,et al.  Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches , 2008 .

[57]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[58]  Ralf Metzler,et al.  Lévy strategies in intermittent search processes are advantageous , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  S. Levin,et al.  Superdiffusion and encounter rates in diluted, low dimensional worlds , 2008 .

[60]  M. Plank,et al.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[61]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Using likelihood to test for Lévy flight search patterns and for general power-law distributions in nature. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[62]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Search and navigation in dynamic environments – from individual behaviors to population distributions , 2008 .

[63]  Denis Boyer,et al.  Evidence for biological L\'evy flights stands , 2008, 0802.1762.

[64]  Elja Arjas,et al.  Bayesian methods for analyzing movements in heterogeneous landscapes from mark-recapture data. , 2008, Ecology.

[65]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Ran Nathan,et al.  An emerging movement ecology paradigm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Andy Reynolds,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? Comment. , 2008, Ecology.

[68]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[69]  Lucas N Joppa,et al.  Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[70]  Benjamin D. Dalziel,et al.  Fitting Probability Distributions to Animal Movement Trajectories: Using Artificial Neural Networks to Link Distance, Resources, and Memory , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[71]  Mark Buchanan,et al.  Ecological modelling: The mathematical mirror to animal nature , 2008, Nature.

[72]  Self-Organized Fractal River Networks 8 FEBRUARY 1993 , 2011 .

[73]  S. Levin,et al.  Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives , 2013 .