Do brief personalized feedback interventions work for mandated students or is it just getting caught that works?

Studies evaluating the efficacy of brief interventions with mandated college students have reported declines in drinking from baseline to short-term follow-up regardless of intervention condition. A key question is whether these observed changes are due to the intervention or to the incident and/or reprimand. This study evaluates a brief personalized feedback intervention (PFI) for students (N = 230) who were referred to a student assistance program because of infractions of university rules regarding substance use to determine whether observed changes in substance use are attributable to the intervention. Half the students received immediate feedback (at baseline and after the 2-month follow-up), and half received delayed feedback (only after the 2-month follow-up). Students in both conditions generally reduced their drinking and alcohol-related problems from baseline to the 2-month follow-up and from the 2-month to the 7-month follow-up; however, there were no significant between-group differences at either follow-up. Therefore, it appears that the incident and/or reprimand are important instigators of mandated student change and that written PFIs do not enhance these effects on a short-term basis but may on a longer term basis.

[1]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[2]  H. Wechsler,et al.  College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study , 2000, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[3]  Joseph L Schafer,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 1997 .

[4]  P. Monti,et al.  Innovations in Adolescent Substance Abuse Interventions , 2001 .

[5]  K. Carey,et al.  Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[6]  R. G. Meyer,et al.  Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short Form C: forensic norms. , 2003, Journal of clinical psychology.

[7]  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  Kim Fromme,et al.  Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[9]  M. Wood,et al.  Motivational interviewing for alcohol-involved adolescents in the emergency room. , 2001 .

[10]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[11]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  The Natural History of Cigarette Smoking: Predicting Young-Adult Smoking Outcomes From Adolescent Smoking Patterns , 1990 .

[13]  P. Monti,et al.  "I'll never drink like that again": characteristics of alcohol-related incidents and predictors of motivation to change in college students. , 2006, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[14]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[15]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Are Telephone Surveys Suitable for Studying Substance Abuse? Cost, Administration, Coverage and Response Rate Issues , 1998 .

[16]  J. Read,et al.  Mandatory alcohol intervention for alcohol-abusing college students: a systematic review. , 2005, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[17]  K. Carey,et al.  Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students. , 2005, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[18]  K. Carey,et al.  Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  L. Forsberg,et al.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the readiness to change questionnaire. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[20]  Helene R White,et al.  Long-term effects of brief substance use interventions for mandated college students: sleeper effects of an in-person personal feedback intervention. , 2007, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[21]  E. M. P. Widmark,et al.  Principles and applications of medicolegal alcohol determination , 1981 .

[22]  M. Larimer,et al.  Brief Intervention in College Settings , 2004, Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

[23]  Henry Wechsler,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[24]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[25]  A. Beck,et al.  Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. , 1984, Journal of clinical psychology.

[26]  W. Miller,et al.  A Theory-Based Motivational Approach for Reducing Alcohol/Drug Problems in College , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[27]  D. J. Hanson,et al.  Surveying the damage: a review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[28]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[29]  S. Darke,et al.  Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. , 1998, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[30]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[31]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. , 2001, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[32]  Jerald G. Bachman,et al.  Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use in Young Adulthood: The Impacts of New Freedoms and New Responsibilities , 1997 .

[33]  G A Marlatt,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[34]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Statistics and Data Analysis: From Elementary to Intermediate , 1999 .

[35]  Ralph Hingson,et al.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001. , 2005, Annual review of public health.

[36]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[37]  T. J. Morgan,et al.  Evaluating two brief substance-use interventions for mandated college students. , 2006, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[38]  H. White.  Reduction of alcohol-related harm on United States college campuses: The use of personal feedback interventions , 2006 .

[39]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  S. Rollnick,et al.  The structure of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire: A test of Prochaska & DiClemente's transtheoretical model , 1996 .

[41]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001 , 2002, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.